Coverage Report - org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.SynchronizedReporterManager
 
Classes in this File Line Coverage Branch Coverage Complexity
SynchronizedReporterManager
0 %
0/19
N/A
1
 
 1  
 package org.apache.maven.surefire.testng;
 2  
 
 3  
 /*
 4  
  * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
 5  
  * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
 6  
  * distributed with this work for additional information
 7  
  * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
 8  
  * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
 9  
  * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
 10  
  * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
 11  
  *
 12  
  *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 13  
  *
 14  
  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
 15  
  * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
 16  
  * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
 17  
  * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 18  
  * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 19  
  * under the License.
 20  
  */
 21  
 
 22  
 import org.apache.maven.surefire.report.ReportEntry;
 23  
 import org.apache.maven.surefire.report.RunListener;
 24  
 import org.apache.maven.surefire.report.ReporterException;
 25  
 
 26  
 /**
 27  
  * A proxy that imposes synchronization on the Reporter.
 28  
  * <p/>
 29  
  * <p/>
 30  
  * At the moment this class only provides "compatible" synchronization that the testng runner can use,
 31  
  * and provides the same (faulty) level of synchronization as the <2.6 versions of surefire.
 32  
  * <p/>
 33  
  * In the "future"  when the concurrent junit provider is rid of all problems of childhood,
 34  
  * it should probably replace the entire reporting secion for testng too.
 35  
  * <p/>
 36  
  * <p/>
 37  
  * <p/>
 38  
  * This design is really only good for single-threaded test execution. Although it is currently
 39  
  * used by testng provider, the design does not really make sense (and is buggy).
 40  
  * <p/>
 41  
  * This is because to get correct results, the client basically needs to do something like this:
 42  
  * synchronized( ReporterManger.getClass()){
 43  
  * reporterManager.runStarted()
 44  
  * reporterManager.testSetStarting()
 45  
  * reporterManager.testStarting()
 46  
  * reporterManager.testSucceeded()
 47  
  * reporterManager.testSetCompleted()
 48  
  * reporterManager.runCompleted()
 49  
  * }
 50  
  * <p/>
 51  
  * This is because the underlying providers are singletons and keep state, if you remove the outer synchronized
 52  
  * block, you may get mixups between results from different tests; although the end result (total test count etc)
 53  
  * should probably be correct.
 54  
  * <p/>
 55  
  * <p/>
 56  
  *
 57  
  * @noinspection deprecation
 58  
  */
 59  
 class SynchronizedReporterManager
 60  
     implements RunListener
 61  
 {
 62  
 
 63  
     private final RunListener target;
 64  
 
 65  
     public SynchronizedReporterManager( RunListener target )
 66  0
     {
 67  0
         this.target = target;
 68  0
     }
 69  
 
 70  
     public synchronized void testSetStarting( ReportEntry report )
 71  
         throws ReporterException
 72  
     {
 73  0
         target.testSetStarting( report );
 74  0
     }
 75  
 
 76  
     public synchronized void testSetCompleted( ReportEntry report )
 77  
         throws ReporterException
 78  
     {
 79  0
         target.testSetCompleted( report );
 80  0
     }
 81  
 
 82  
     public synchronized void testStarting( ReportEntry report )
 83  
     {
 84  0
         target.testStarting( report );
 85  0
     }
 86  
 
 87  
     public synchronized void testSucceeded( ReportEntry report )
 88  
     {
 89  0
         target.testSucceeded( report );
 90  0
     }
 91  
 
 92  
     public synchronized void testSkipped( ReportEntry report )
 93  
     {
 94  0
         target.testSkipped( report );
 95  0
     }
 96  
 
 97  
 
 98  
     public synchronized void testError( ReportEntry reportEntry )
 99  
     {
 100  0
         target.testError( reportEntry );
 101  0
     }
 102  
 
 103  
     public synchronized void testFailed( ReportEntry reportEntry )
 104  
     {
 105  0
         target.testFailed( reportEntry );
 106  0
     }
 107  
 
 108  
     public synchronized void testAssumptionFailure( ReportEntry report )
 109  
     {
 110  0
         target.testAssumptionFailure( report );
 111  0
     }
 112  
 }