Owner: Christian Jansen	Last Change: December 22, 2005	Status: Preliminary
Goal of this document: This rule set assists specification authors creating specifications. It captures the essential specification rules that have to be followed.
Intended readership: Specification authors, specification reviewers (Development , Quality Assurance , User Experience, Documentation)
Send Feedback to: dev@specs.openoffice.org

Each of the following rules [R] is accompanied by a couple of checklist questions. The optimum is to answer all of the questions with 'Yes'.

R1 [COMPLETE]:

First and foremost a specification has to be complete. That means all relevant aspects of a feature have been captured.

When user interfaces (UI) are involved:

• Are the topics of the Accessibility Checklist covered?
• Are the topics of the Globalization Checklist  covered?
• Are the topics of the OpenOffice.org Interface Text Style Guide checklist covered?
• Do alerts meet the requirements specified in the Alert Guidelines?
• Are all menu related changes specified in the Comprehensive OpenOffice.org Menu specification?
• Are all tool bar related changes specified in the Comprehensive OpenOffice.org Tool bar specification?
• Is each UI element specified in detail (e.g default values, input and output ranges, interactions and possible relations to other UI elements and parts of the UI)?
• Is the exception handling specified in detail?

R2 [CLEAR]:

• Each statement has to be unambiguously clear to Development , Quality Assurance, USer Experience and Documentation.
• Is the specification in itself clear enough to the intended readership for being implemented, being tested and for being documented?
  
• Are you using quantifiable statements instead of interpretable generalities?
• Have you avoided to use terms like “more”, “most”, “less”, “easy”, “improve”, “enhanced”, “better”?
• Are you consistent within the specification and to specifications which relate to the feature you are specifying?

R3 [SIMPLE]:

• Each statement shall be as short and simple as possible.

Is any secondary writing regarding the detailed specification clearly separated e.g. “comments”, “notes”, “suggestions”, “ideas”, “reasons”?

Document History:

Revision	Change	Initials	Date
1	First draft created	CJ/TRA	June 8, 2005
2	Reviewed by Jörg Sievers	JSI	June 8, 2005
3	Based on feedback rules revised	CJ/TRA	June 9, 2005
4	Merged rules and checklist questions	CJ/TRA	July 18, 2005
5	Based on inspection rules & header revised	CJ	September 30, 2005
6	Header revised	CJ	October 10, 2005
7	R1 revised,R3 revised, Links added	CJ	October 19, 2005
8	Made doc OpenOffice.org compliant	CJ	December 22, 2005
9	Reviewed by CJ/TRA	CJ/TRA	December 29, 2005