/[Apache-SVN]/cocoon/whiteboard/doc-repos/old-2.2-documentation/xdocs/introduction.xml
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /cocoon/whiteboard/doc-repos/old-2.2-documentation/xdocs/introduction.xml

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Patch Patch

--- cocoon/whiteboard/doc-repos/old-2.2-documentation/xdocs/introduction.xml	2005/04/01 16:39:19	159706
+++ cocoon/whiteboard/doc-repos/old-2.2-documentation/xdocs/introduction.xml	2005/04/01 16:46:58	159707
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@
 <!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//APACHE//DTD Documentation V1.0//EN" "document-v10.dtd">
 
 <document>
-
   <header>
-    <title>Introducing Cocoon</title>
+    <title>Introducing Apache Cocoon</title>
+    <version>$Id$</version>
     <authors>
       <person name="Stefano Mazzocchi" email="stefano@apache.org"/>
     </authors>
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ At this point, clearly not, rather the o
 </p>
 
 <p>
-So, you could be wondering, why did we spend so much effort to 
+So, you could be wondering, why did we spend so much effort to
 write an XML publishing framework? This document was written exactly
 to clear your doubts on this, so let's keep going.
 </p>
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ semantics. How this can possibly help yo
 <p>
 This was the point where Stefano was more or less two years ago for
 java.apache.org: I could use XML and define my own semantics with
-<![CDATA[<sidebar>]]>, <![CDATA[<news>]]>, <![CDATA[<status>]]> 
+<![CDATA[<sidebar>]]>, <![CDATA[<news>]]>, <![CDATA[<status>]]>
 and all that and I'm sure people would have
 found those XML documents much easier to write (since the XML syntax is
 very similar to the HTML one and very user friendly)... but I would have

 

infrastructure at apache.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26