From: "Julien Nioche (JIRA)" To: dev@tika.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (TIKA-461) RFC822 messages not parsed Reply-To: dev@tika.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tika.apache.org Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 05:25:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <6089099.260231278600349994.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906468#action_12906468 ] Julien Nioche commented on TIKA-461: ------------------------------------ I'll have a look at mime4j and try to use it in Tika > RFC822 messages not parsed > -------------------------- > > Key: TIKA-461 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-461 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Bug > Components: parser > Affects Versions: 0.7 > Reporter: Joshua Turner > Assignee: Julien Nioche > > Presented with an RFC822 message exported from Thunderbird, AutodetectParser produces an empty body, and a Metadata containing only one key-value pair: "Content-Type=message/rfc822". Directly calling MboxParser likewise gives an empty body, but with two metadata pairs: "Content-Encoding=us-ascii Content-Type=application/mbox". > A quick peek at the source of MboxParser shows that the implementation is pretty naive. If the wiring can be sorted out, something like Apache James' mime4j might be a better bet. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.