### khop-sc-neighbors.cf v 201405817 ### Khopesh's syndication of SpamCop's top offenders and top offending networks. ### ### Spamassassin rules written by Adam Katz ### http://khopesh.com/Anti-spam ### khopesh on irc://irc.freenode.net/#spamassassin ### ### sa-update --gpgkey E8B493D6 --channel khop-sc-neighbors.sa.khopesh.com ### ### These rules are Copyright 2001-2009 by Adam Katz ### Licensed under the Apache License 2.0. ### The code that generated this output is GNU Affero General Public License v3. ### Source data (copyright Cisco) was taken from links below. ### ### Frequent updates are needed for these rules, so they are marked 'nopublish' ### This keeps them from being automatically promoted to SpamAssassin proper ### from the testing system, which affirms their usefulness. You can check ### their efficiency at http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FKHOP_SC # #meta __KHOP_SC_EXCLUSIONS __VIA_ML || __freemail_safe || __RCVD_IN_DNSWL || RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL # ## http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;mask=4294967295;net=0;sort=56 ## Due to the massive block size, this rule only examines the last untrusted #header __KHOP_SC_CIDR8 X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]* (?:by|ip)=(?-xism:\b(?:117|46|95|2)(?:\.[012]?\d{1,2}){3}\b) / ## and gets cleaned up a bit #meta KHOP_SC_CIDR8 __KHOP_SC_CIDR8 && !__KHOP_SC_EXCLUSIONS #describe KHOP_SC_CIDR8 Relay CIDR /8 is among worst in SpamCop #tflags KHOP_SC_CIDR8 nopublish #score KHOP_SC_CIDR8 0.1 0.02 0.2 0.1 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 12.3692/1.0099 0.925 20100211 .2 .1 .3 .2 -> .1 .01 .1 .01 ## 8.9412/1.1532 0.886 20100325 ## 9.4362/0.4074 0.959 20100329 ## 11.8281/0.4788 0.961 20100401 without meta ## 11.8578/0.4495 0.961 20100402 half meta (oops). decreased worst 4/8->4/7 ## 7.8856/0.1388 0.983 20100403 meta, net, solo=7.9236/0.4189 ## changed from rank by spam count to rank by hosts reported, back to 4/8 ## 12.1963/0.0356 0.997 20100406 (wow) solo=12.2454/0.0408@0.997 ## 12.0753/0.0359 0.997 20100409 solo=12.1265/0.0412@0.997 ## 12.1449/0.0139 0.999 20100410 net, solo=12.1966/0.0197@0.998, ->.2 .1 .3 .2 ## 10.3554/0.0112 0.999 20110227@510k solo=10.3717/0.0119@0.999, ->.3 .1 .3 .1 ## 1.5335/0.5063 0.752 20130629@465k net, solo=1.5947/0.5379@0.748 ## 2.0256/0.7432 0.732 20130705@376k solo=2.0429/0.7595@0.729, ->.1 .02 .2 .1 # #header __KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]* (?:by|ip)=(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:13|78|90)|37)(?:\.[012]?\d{1,2}){3}\b) / #meta KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 __KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 && !__KHOP_SC_EXCLUSIONS #describe KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 Relay CIDR /8 leads SpamCop in worst /8s #tflags KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 nopublish #score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 0.1 0 0.1 0 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 15.6795/0.1173 0.993 20100211 .5 .4 .8 .6 -> .6 .5 .8 .5 ## 11.0578/0.3614 0.968 20100325 ## 13.7809/0.4860 0.966 20100329 .9 .1 .9 .1 masscheck promoted ## 14.1773/0.4799 0.967 20100401 ## 14.1807/0.4960 0.966 20100402 without meta ## 14.0841/0.0926 0.993 20100402 added meta (wow!) ## 14.2553/0.0424 0.997 20100403 net, solo=14.3609/0.4888@0.967 ## 11.6252/0.1263 0.989 20100406 solo=11.7104/0.5366@0.956 ## 11.5987/0.1295 0.989 20100409 solo=11.6856/0.5731@0.953 ## 11.6286/0.0475 0.996 20100410 net, solo=11.7224/0.6900@0.944, ->LE as above ## 10.6798/0.1269 0.993 20110227@510k solo=10.6996/0.5918@0.948 -> .2 0 .2 0 ## 3.6096/0.2502 0.935 20130629@465k net, solo=3.7125/1.5080@0.711 ## 4.1386/0.8450 0.830 20130705@376k solo=4.1707/1.5958@0.723 ->.1 0 .1 0 # ## http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;net=bmaxcnt;mask=16777215;sort=spamcnt #header KHOP_SC_CIDR16 Received =~ /___ FAILED TO POPULATE ___/ #describe KHOP_SC_CIDR16 Relay CIDR /16 is among worst in SpamCop #tflags KHOP_SC_CIDR16 nopublish #score KHOP_SC_CIDR16 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 0.7444/0.0129 0.983 20100211 ## 0.5943/0.0139 0.977 20100325 .6 .5 .9 .75 ## 0.8767/0.0167 0.981 20100329 1.6 .5 1.6 .5 masscheck promoted ## 0.6952/0.0011 0.998 20100401 increased worst offenders 6/12->9/15 @ 20100401 ## 0.6814/0.0149 0.979 20100402 ## 0.4399/0.0008 0.998 20100403 net run ## 0.2102/0.0011 0.995 20100406 ## 0 /0 0 20100409 (wha!?) ## crap, still empty 20100410 bad scrape, script failed to populate rule ## crap, still empty 20110227 this is due to safety net exclns -> 1 .2 1 .2 ## crap, still empty 20130629@465k net ## crap, still empty 20130705@376k net. lowering for low vol -> .4 .1 .4 .1 # #header KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 Received =~ /(?-xism:\b211\.186(?:\.[012]?\d{1,2}){2}\b)/ #describe KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 Relay CIDR /16 leads SpamCop in worst /16s #tflags KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 nopublish #score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.3 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 0.8862/0.0008 0.999 20100211 ## 0.5738/0.0008 0.999 20100325 .9 .8 1.3 1.2 ## 0.6658/0 1.000 20100329 2 .5 2 .5 masscheck promoted ## 0.8374/0 1.000 20100401 ## 1.1534/0 1.000 20100402 ## 1.2077/0.0145 0.988 20100403 net run ## 1.2155/0.0142 0.988 20100406 ## 1.2779/0.0142 0.989 20100409 ## 1.0611/0.0009 0.999 20100410 net ## 0.5034/0 1.000 20110227@510k 2 .3 2 .4 ## 0.0140/0 1.000 20130629@465k net ## 0/0 - 20130705@376k lowering for low vol -> .6 .2 .7 .3 # # ## http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;net=cmaxcnt;mask=65535;sort=spamcnt #header KHOP_SC_CIDR24 Received =~ /(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:2(?:3\.114\.110|0\.43\.94)|84\.(?:82\.171|22\.44)|07\.158\.214|73\.208\.241|17\.19\.216|94\.105\.9|\.93\.58)|69\.175\.114|2\.230\.25)\.[012]?\d{1,2}\b)/ #describe KHOP_SC_CIDR24 Relay CIDR /24 is among worst in SpamCop #tflags KHOP_SC_CIDR24 nopublish #score KHOP_SC_CIDR24 0.6 0 0.6 0 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 0.1350/0 1.000 20100211 ## 0.0798/0 1.000 20100325 .9 .8 1.3 1.2 ## 0.0159/0 1.000 20100329 2.5 .6 2.5 .6 masscheck promoted ## 0.1577/0 1.000 20100401 ## added top host-count /24s, increased worst offenders 6/12->8/15 @ 20100401 ## 0.1223/0 1.000 20100402 (oops, too small a pool) ## host-count 84/64->84/50, offenders 8/15->10/20 @ 20100402 ## 0.2547/0 1.000 20100403 net ## 0.2126/0 1.000 20100406 ## 0.2960/0 1.000 20100409 ## 0.2905/0 1.000 20100410 net ## 0.4157/0.5009 0.454 20110227 something is wrong here! -> .1 0 .1 0 ## 0.0004/0 1.000 20130629@465k net ## 0.4428/0 1.000 20130705@376k resume scores -> .6 0 .6 0 # # #header KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 Received =~ /(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:7(?:3\.45\.(?:111|94)|8\.216\.50)|17\.19\.217|84\.22\.53)|6(?:3\.141\.245|8\.233\.239|4\.79\.92)|91\.215\.13[6789]|23\.92\.60|74\.91\.25)\.[012]?\d{1,2}\b)/ #describe KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 Relay CIDR /24 leads SpamCop in worst /24s #tflags KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 nopublish #score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 1.7 0.5 1.7 0.5 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 0.2528/0.0092 0.965 20100211 ## 0.2231/0.0112 0.952 20100325 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.8 ## 0.0249/0 1.000 20100329 2.7 .6 2.7 .6 masscheck promoted ## 0.1594/0 1.000 20100401 ## 0.6448/0 1.000 20100402 (wow!) ## 0.6896/0 1.000 20100403 net ## 0.6255/0.0045 0.993 20100406 ## 0.7261/0.0045 0.994 20100409 ## 0.7447/0.0054 0.993 20100410 net ## 0.5722/0 1.000 20110227@510k 2.7 .5 2.7 .5 ## 0.1483/0 1.000 20130629@465k net ## 0.0197/0 1.000 20130705@376k -> 1.7 .5 1.7 .5 # # ## http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=hoshame #header KHOP_SC_TOP200 Received =~ /(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:2(?:4\.(?:1(?:56\.251\.1(?:22|54)|13\.149\.160|27\.197\.62|73\.122\.75)|7(?:3\.14(?:0\.119|\.88)|7\.184\.130))|5\.(?:4(?:3\.78\.105|6\.61\.12)|79\.9(?:3\.231|5\.9)|65\.77\.24[01]|91\.130\.95)|3\.1(?:14\.110\.127|25\.19\.44)|0\.43\.9(?:2\.196|4\.107)|1\.12\.125\.47)|8(?:4\.(?:22\.(?:53\.(?:190?|201)|197\.216|44\.143|83\.154)|82\.1(?:7(?:1\.234|9\.117)|23\.85))|3\.(?:1(?:60\.1(?:82\.229|26\.17)|0\.122\.169)|61\.243\.9)|7\.(?:102\.153\.146|23\.42\.59)|9\.205\.184\.161|2\.37\.217\.243)|9(?:9\.(?:19(?:2\.15(?:3\.158|4\.114|2\.42)|3\.66\.195)|36\.76\.(?:190|241))|8\.(?:23\.158\.162|46\.135\.217|52\.165\.155)|2\.1(?:87\.114\.14[02]|61\.177\.73)|4\.105\.9\.85)|1(?:(?:5\.(?:28\.82\.14|71\.28\.5)|6\.112\.66\.10|0\.88\.241\.4)2|8\.(?:123\.4\.7[56]|244\.229\.168|69\.198\.212)|7\.19\.21(?:6\.150|7\.235)|9\.254\.66\.7)|7(?:3\.(?:45\.(?:94\.(?:2(?:1[12456789]|20)|4[135]|38)|111\.(?:8[3456789]|9[012]))|2(?:08\.241\.9[1234]|12\.205\.158))|8\.216\.50\.39)|\.93\.(?:5(?:8\.(?:1(?:63|70)|2(?:29|53))|7\.1[89]6)|4(?:1\.160|6\.156|5\.67|7\.65))|0(?:(?:6\.186\.22\.15|3\.21\.198\.8)9|1\.14\.252\.236)|4\.(?:18\.207\.225|23\.106\.202))|2(?:1(?:9\.138\.23(?:6\.2(?:2[04]|39)|9\.(?:[013]|212)|7\.2(?:03|22)|8\.5)|2\.(?:1(?:46\.101\.154|54\.154\.220)|99\.249\.5)|1\.1(?:62\.79\.6[589]|86\.255\.122|03\.210\.38)|0\.(?:189\.77\.129|51\.4\.11)|7\.33\.146\.210|8\.90\.174\.167)|2(?:(?:2\.78\.127\.12|0\.68\.224\.4)5|3\.240\.1(?:28\.221|33\.134)|1\.143\.50\.236)|3\.(?:92\.60\.(?:1(?:[46]|72)|6[26]|81)|239\.106\.103)|0(?:2\.234\.40\.41|3\.100\.0\.34)|\.23(?:5\.162\.168|0\.25\.144))|6(?:0\.(?:1(?:68\.113\.147|73\.14\.80)|2(?:13\.63\.138|35\.43\.226))|1\.(?:1(?:57\.96\.1(?:0[59]|11)|64\.43\.140)|93\.246\.49)|3\.(?:141\.245\.(?:2[024]|18)|221\.140\.143)|8\.233\.239\.(?:1(?:[123]|0[012]?)|9[789]?)|(?:6\.197\.231\.14|2\.48\.186\.15)8|4\.79\.92\.(?:5[123456789]|60))|5(?:9\.(?:37\.162\.187|58\.242\.216|63\.182\.125)|8\.2(?:15\.52\.159|2\.103\.208|46\.179\.82))|7(?:4\.91\.25\.(?:5[012489]|62)|8\.129\.194\.(?:118|83)|2\.11\.148\.188)|9(?:3\.63\.141\.186|4\.41\.90\.109)|46\.249\.54\.104|80\.227\.12\.90)\b)/ #describe KHOP_SC_TOP200 Relay listed in SpamCop top 200 spammer IPs #tflags KHOP_SC_TOP200 nopublish #score KHOP_SC_TOP200 4 0 4 0 # unnecessary if DNSBLs work ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 1.2552/0 1.000 20100211 ## 0.8558/0 1.000 20100325 3.4 3.2 3.7 3.5 ## 0.1265/0 1.000 20100329 4 0 4 0 masscheck promoted ## 0.7066/0 1.000 20100401 ## 0.6558/0 1.000 20100403 net ## 0.6211/0 1.000 20100406 ## 0.5307/0 1.000 20100409 ## 0.5617/0 1.000 20100410 net ## 0.3655/0 1.000 20110227@510k ## 2.6827/0.0069 0.997 20130629@465k net ## 2.9091/0.0056 0.998 20130705@376k # # ## Spamhaus DROP, http://www.spamhaus.org/drop/ #header KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /___ FAILED TO POPULATE ___/ #describe KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP Relay listed in Spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List #tflags KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP nopublish #score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP 1 0.2 1 0.2 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 0.0349/0.0029 0.924 20110227@510k # #header KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^[^]]*___ FAILED TO POPULATE ___/ #describe KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE Relay listed in Spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List #tflags KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE nopublish #score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE 2 0 2 0 # adds to KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 0.0241/0 1.000 20110227@510k # # ## PSBL-neighbors: any /24 with 73+ (2/7, 29%) IPs in the PSBL (not SpamCop), ## as obtained from rsync://psbl-mirror.surriel.com::psbl/psbl.txt #header KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ / (?:by|ip)=(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:1(?:1\.176\.(?:[67]|(?:12|8)[4567]|4[89]?|5[01]?)|6\.207\.(?:6[0123]|4[89]|5\d))|8(?:6\.(?:1(?:3\.[0124567]|22\.4[4567])|37\.202)|1\.66\.15[67]|8\.73\.252)|0(?:3\.(?:2(?:5(?:1\.157|3\.21)|42\.7)|19\.16[013])|9\.127\.80)|9(?:0\.234\.106|4\.219\.240|8\.23\.198|9\.19\.92)|2(?:3\.136\.106|2\.155\.34)|30\.193\.1(?:47|65)|77\.36\.17)|2(?:7\.20\.(?:[89]|1(?:0[0123]?|[28][89]|[39][01]|7[6789]|1)|24[01234567]|4[0123]|5[6789])|1(?:2\.(?:73\.15[89]|5\.158)|1\.91\.22[01])|0(?:0\.(?:63\.160|81\.44)|3\.191\.25))|5(?:8\.50\.1(?:[2345]|1[012356789]|0[456789])|\.172\.24[67])|9(?:1\.215\.13[6789]|4\.230\.93|5\.159\.68)|41\.254\.[2568])\.[012]?\d{1,2}\b)/ #describe KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 Relay's IP/24 CIDR contains many PSBL hits #tflags KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 nopublish #score KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 2 0.6 2 0.6 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 0.5363/0 1.000 20100401 ## 0.7486/0 1.000 20100402 ## 0.7317/0 1.000 20100403 net run. min hosts 73->65 ## 0.9316/0 1.000 20100406 ## 0.9473/0 1.000 20100409 ## 0.9545/0 1.000 20100410 net ## 0.6985/0.0014 0.998 20110227@510k 2 .6 2 .6 ## 0.4298/0 1.000 20130629@465k net ## 1.0958/0 1.000 20130705@376k # ## test for ruleqa, 20100409, http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=/KHOP_SPAMMY #meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR24 KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24||KHOP_SC_CIDR24||KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 ## est. 1.2/0.0050@.996, floor: 1.0/0.0112@.989, ceiling: 1.4/0@1 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 1.2645/0.0054 0.996 20100410 net ## 1.1562/0.0058 0.995 20100417 net ## 1.1332/0.5023 0.693 20110227@510k ## 0.5785/0 1.000 20130629@465k net ## 1.5583/0 1.000 20130705@376k # #meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR16 KHOP_SC_CIDR16||KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 ## est. 1.4/0.02@.986, floor: 1.3/0.0312@.977, ceiling: 2.0/0.0150@.993 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 1.0611/0.0009 0.999 20100410 net ## 1.9539/0.0152 0.992 20100417 net ## 0.5034/0 1.000 20110227@510k ## 0.0140/0 1.000 20130629@465k net ## 0/0 - 20130705@376k # #meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR8 KHOP_SC_CIDR8||KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 ## est. 23.7/0.15@.994, floor: 23/0.2685@.988, ceiling: 26.5/0.0789@.997 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 23.7686/0.0614 0.997 20100410 net ## 22.2300/0.0616 0.997 20100417 net ## 21.0352/0.1381 0.993 20110227@510k ## 5.1431/0.7565 0.872 20130629@465k net ## 6.1642/1.5881 0.795 20130705@376k # #meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_SUBNET __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR24||__KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR16 ## est. 26.2/0.175@.993, floor: 24.5/0.5@.980, ceiling: 30.1/0.1@.997 ## spam/ham s/o corpus ## 25.6744/0.0677 0.997 20100410 net, beat estimated ceiling (for ham)! ## 23.7846/0.0826 0.997 20100417 net, beat ceiling ham, but beat floor spam ## 23.7505/0.1041 0.996 20100418 too much ham, nixing /8, new est. 3.0/.02@.993 ## 1.6366/0.5023 0.765 20110227@510k ## 0.5925/0 1.000 20130629@465k net ## 1.5583/0 1.000 20130705@376k # # # ## Bump these up to compensate for expected but absent overlap (94+% noted below) #if (! plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval) ) # score KHOP_SC_CIDR8 (0) (0.2) (0) (0.2) # BRBL(98%) # score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 (0) (0.9) (0) (0.9) # BRBL(98%) # score KHOP_SC_CIDR16 (0) (1.5) (0) (1.5) # BRBL(99%), PBL(98%) # score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 (0) (1.7) (0) (1.7) # BRBL(99%), PBL(94%) # score KHOP_SC_CIDR24 (0) (0.9) (0) (0.9) # SC(99) BRBL(96) MSPIKE(96) # score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 (0) (2.5) (0) (2.5) # MSPIKE(99) SC(98) BRBL(97) ... # # PSBL(97) HOSTKARMA(97) # score KHOP_SC_TOP200 (0) (4.4) (0) (4.4) # SC(99) PSBL(99) ... # # HOSTKARMA(99) SEMBLACK(99) BRBL(98) MSPIKE(94) # score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP (0) (3) (0) (3) # SBL(78) # score KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 (0) (1.5) (0) (1.5) # BRBL(98) XBL(95) #endif # #