## khop-sc-neighbors.cf v 201401252 ## Khopesh's syndication of SpamCop's top offenders and top offending networks. ## ## Spamassassin rules written by Adam Katz ## http://khopesh.com/Anti-spam ## khopesh on irc://irc.freenode.net/#spamassassin ## ## sa-update --gpgkey E8B493D6 --channel khop-sc-neighbors.sa.khopesh.com ## ## These rules are Copyright 2001-2009 by Adam Katz ## Licensed under the Apache License 2.0. ## The code that generated this output is GNU Affero General Public License v3. ## Source data (copyright Cisco) was taken from links below. ## ## Frequent updates are needed for these rules, so they are marked 'nopublish' ## This keeps them from being automatically promoted to SpamAssassin proper ## from the testing system, which affirms their usefulness. You can check ## their efficiency at http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FKHOP_SC meta __KHOP_SC_EXCLUSIONS __VIA_ML || __freemail_safe || __RCVD_IN_DNSWL || RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL # http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;mask=4294967295;net=0;sort=56 # Due to the massive block size, this rule only examines the last untrusted header __KHOP_SC_CIDR8 X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]* (?:by|ip)=(?-xism:\b(?:117|9?5|46)(?:\.[012]?\d{1,2}){3}\b) / # and gets cleaned up a bit meta KHOP_SC_CIDR8 __KHOP_SC_CIDR8 && !__KHOP_SC_EXCLUSIONS describe KHOP_SC_CIDR8 Relay CIDR /8 is among worst in SpamCop tflags KHOP_SC_CIDR8 nopublish score KHOP_SC_CIDR8 0.1 0.02 0.2 0.1 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 12.3692/1.0099 0.925 20100211 .2 .1 .3 .2 -> .1 .01 .1 .01 # 8.9412/1.1532 0.886 20100325 # 9.4362/0.4074 0.959 20100329 # 11.8281/0.4788 0.961 20100401 without meta # 11.8578/0.4495 0.961 20100402 half meta (oops). decreased worst 4/8->4/7 # 7.8856/0.1388 0.983 20100403 meta, net, solo=7.9236/0.4189 # changed from rank by spam count to rank by hosts reported, back to 4/8 # 12.1963/0.0356 0.997 20100406 (wow) solo=12.2454/0.0408@0.997 # 12.0753/0.0359 0.997 20100409 solo=12.1265/0.0412@0.997 # 12.1449/0.0139 0.999 20100410 net, solo=12.1966/0.0197@0.998, ->.2 .1 .3 .2 # 10.3554/0.0112 0.999 20110227@510k solo=10.3717/0.0119@0.999, ->.3 .1 .3 .1 # 1.5335/0.5063 0.752 20130629@465k net, solo=1.5947/0.5379@0.748 # 2.0256/0.7432 0.732 20130705@376k solo=2.0429/0.7595@0.729, ->.1 .02 .2 .1 header __KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]* (?:by|ip)=(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:78|90)|37|2)(?:\.[012]?\d{1,2}){3}\b) / meta KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 __KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 && !__KHOP_SC_EXCLUSIONS describe KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 Relay CIDR /8 leads SpamCop in worst /8s tflags KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 nopublish score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 0.1 0 0.1 0 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 15.6795/0.1173 0.993 20100211 .5 .4 .8 .6 -> .6 .5 .8 .5 # 11.0578/0.3614 0.968 20100325 # 13.7809/0.4860 0.966 20100329 .9 .1 .9 .1 masscheck promoted # 14.1773/0.4799 0.967 20100401 # 14.1807/0.4960 0.966 20100402 without meta # 14.0841/0.0926 0.993 20100402 added meta (wow!) # 14.2553/0.0424 0.997 20100403 net, solo=14.3609/0.4888@0.967 # 11.6252/0.1263 0.989 20100406 solo=11.7104/0.5366@0.956 # 11.5987/0.1295 0.989 20100409 solo=11.6856/0.5731@0.953 # 11.6286/0.0475 0.996 20100410 net, solo=11.7224/0.6900@0.944, ->LE as above # 10.6798/0.1269 0.993 20110227@510k solo=10.6996/0.5918@0.948 -> .2 0 .2 0 # 3.6096/0.2502 0.935 20130629@465k net, solo=3.7125/1.5080@0.711 # 4.1386/0.8450 0.830 20130705@376k solo=4.1707/1.5958@0.723 ->.1 0 .1 0 # http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;net=bmaxcnt;mask=16777215;sort=spamcnt header KHOP_SC_CIDR16 Received =~ /___ FAILED TO POPULATE ___/ describe KHOP_SC_CIDR16 Relay CIDR /16 is among worst in SpamCop tflags KHOP_SC_CIDR16 nopublish score KHOP_SC_CIDR16 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.1 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 0.7444/0.0129 0.983 20100211 # 0.5943/0.0139 0.977 20100325 .6 .5 .9 .75 # 0.8767/0.0167 0.981 20100329 1.6 .5 1.6 .5 masscheck promoted # 0.6952/0.0011 0.998 20100401 increased worst offenders 6/12->9/15 @ 20100401 # 0.6814/0.0149 0.979 20100402 # 0.4399/0.0008 0.998 20100403 net run # 0.2102/0.0011 0.995 20100406 # 0 /0 0 20100409 (wha!?) # crap, still empty 20100410 bad scrape, script failed to populate rule # crap, still empty 20110227 this is due to safety net exclns -> 1 .2 1 .2 # crap, still empty 20130629@465k net # crap, still empty 20130705@376k net. lowering for low vol -> .4 .1 .4 .1 header KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 Received =~ /___ FAILED TO POPULATE ___/ describe KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 Relay CIDR /16 leads SpamCop in worst /16s tflags KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 nopublish score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.3 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 0.8862/0.0008 0.999 20100211 # 0.5738/0.0008 0.999 20100325 .9 .8 1.3 1.2 # 0.6658/0 1.000 20100329 2 .5 2 .5 masscheck promoted # 0.8374/0 1.000 20100401 # 1.1534/0 1.000 20100402 # 1.2077/0.0145 0.988 20100403 net run # 1.2155/0.0142 0.988 20100406 # 1.2779/0.0142 0.989 20100409 # 1.0611/0.0009 0.999 20100410 net # 0.5034/0 1.000 20110227@510k 2 .3 2 .4 # 0.0140/0 1.000 20130629@465k net # 0/0 - 20130705@376k lowering for low vol -> .6 .2 .7 .3 # http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;net=cmaxcnt;mask=65535;sort=spamcnt header KHOP_SC_CIDR24 Received =~ /(?-xism:\b(?:2(?:1(?:0\.183\.179|9\.139\.38)|09\.245\.91|3\.254\.134)|6(?:1\.163\.101|0\.29\.104)|1(?:01\.14\.25|24\.42\.1)3|7(?:5\.144\.8|4\.91\.3)1|37\.48\.66)\.[012]?\d{1,2}\b)/ describe KHOP_SC_CIDR24 Relay CIDR /24 is among worst in SpamCop tflags KHOP_SC_CIDR24 nopublish score KHOP_SC_CIDR24 0.6 0 0.6 0 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 0.1350/0 1.000 20100211 # 0.0798/0 1.000 20100325 .9 .8 1.3 1.2 # 0.0159/0 1.000 20100329 2.5 .6 2.5 .6 masscheck promoted # 0.1577/0 1.000 20100401 # added top host-count /24s, increased worst offenders 6/12->8/15 @ 20100401 # 0.1223/0 1.000 20100402 (oops, too small a pool) # host-count 84/64->84/50, offenders 8/15->10/20 @ 20100402 # 0.2547/0 1.000 20100403 net # 0.2126/0 1.000 20100406 # 0.2960/0 1.000 20100409 # 0.2905/0 1.000 20100410 net # 0.4157/0.5009 0.454 20110227 something is wrong here! -> .1 0 .1 0 # 0.0004/0 1.000 20130629@465k net # 0.4428/0 1.000 20130705@376k resume scores -> .6 0 .6 0 header KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 Received =~ /(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:2(?:0\.(?:143\.54|84\.13)|5\.(?:60\.156|93\.77))|0(?:1\.(?:50\.1[23]|9\.207)|3\.246\.195)|9(?:0\.234\.10[56]|8\.143\.150)|(?:73\.208\.18|16\.112\.6)6|81\.66\.15[67]|34\.255\.250|57\.14\.103)|2(?:1(?:8\.159\.195|7\.23\.6)|21\.238\.21)|9(?:1\.218\.245|4\.20\.224)|31\.192\.111)\.[012]?\d{1,2}\b)/ describe KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 Relay CIDR /24 leads SpamCop in worst /24s tflags KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 nopublish score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 1.7 0.5 1.7 0.5 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 0.2528/0.0092 0.965 20100211 # 0.2231/0.0112 0.952 20100325 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.8 # 0.0249/0 1.000 20100329 2.7 .6 2.7 .6 masscheck promoted # 0.1594/0 1.000 20100401 # 0.6448/0 1.000 20100402 (wow!) # 0.6896/0 1.000 20100403 net # 0.6255/0.0045 0.993 20100406 # 0.7261/0.0045 0.994 20100409 # 0.7447/0.0054 0.993 20100410 net # 0.5722/0 1.000 20110227@510k 2.7 .5 2.7 .5 # 0.1483/0 1.000 20130629@465k net # 0.0197/0 1.000 20130705@376k -> 1.7 .5 1.7 .5 # http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=hoshame header KHOP_SC_TOP200 Received =~ /(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:1(?:2\.(?:216\.(?:105\.90|86\.253|46\.75)|168\.218\.86)|5\.(?:8(?:8\.119\.132|5\.64\.210)|92\.125\.186)|9\.(?:1(?:10\.108\.92|93\.93\.25)|42\.147\.114)|8\.(?:4(?:6\.127\.36|1\.157\.3)|244\.239\.2)|4\.(?:141\.253\.14|247\.23\.66|32\.177\.77)|(?:3\.130\.65\.16|7\.19\.75\.23)1|6\.1(?:12\.66\.102|93\.90\.26))|2(?:1\.(?:1(?:5(?:8\.198\.78|9\.11\.164)|34\.(?:238\.12|190\.5)9)|88\.54\.17)|2\.(?:147\.232\.10|49\.119\.18)8|5\.(?:131\.29\.100|93\.77\.125)|4\.(?:42\.13\.230|160\.35\.2))|8(?:4\.(?:22\.(?:1(?:97\.216|52\.8)|53\.(?:190?|201))|82\.1(?:7(?:1\.234|9\.117)|23\.85))|8\.2(?:19\.14\.43|6\.102\.92)|2\.172\.22\.5[79]|0\.204\.193\.114|3\.98\.235\.12)|9(?:8\.1(?:43\.150\.2(?:4[0789]|5[012]|39)|2\.80\.87)|0\.(?:107\.140\.76|90\.193\.202)|7\.(?:159\.16\.5|253\.6\.6)8|3\.109\.69\.147|5\.62\.172\.242)|0(?:1\.(?:9\.20(?:7\.(?:11|23)9|6\.167)|14\.(?:253\.7|88\.11)9|50\.12\.132)|6\.245\.240\.205)|7(?:3\.2(?:08\.(?:186\.8[3456]|215\.164)|12\.205\.158)|2\.245\.62\.172)|63\.177\.132\.144|47\.175\.214\.72)|2(?:1(?:9\.(?:1(?:4(?:0\.69\.12|7\.172\.)2|39\.38\.49)|238\.181\.120)|1\.(?:17(?:2\.251\.168|4\.178\.175)|232\.154\.6)|7\.23\.6\.(?:1(?:6[89]|08|46)|21[23])|(?:3\.135\.113\.19|6\.172\.98\.16)7|0\.183\.179\.(?:3[89]|4[45])|8\.159\.195\.251|2\.220\.1\.15)|2(?:1\.2(?:3(?:2\.247\.27|8\.21\.251)|14\.2(?:08\.226|14\.187)|04\.223\.38)|2\.(?:(?:100\.234\.25|232\.130\.10)1|35\.61\.196))|0(?:2\.(?:2(?:07\.1\.234|34\.40\.41)|137\.22\.200|71\.98\.62)|3\.2(?:30\.112\.4[45]|52\.154\.246))|3\.2(?:54\.134\.17|45\.26\.9)6|7\.120\.103\.37|4\.48\.219\.49)|9(?:1\.218\.245\.(?:[456789]|2[012346789]?|1[012345689]|30?)|3\.(?:1(?:57\.148\.102|84\.71\.66)|90\.102\.194)|(?:2\.50\.155\.21|4\.77\.199\.14)8)|3(?:1\.1(?:92\.111\.(?:2(?:1[023456789]|0[23456789]|2[01])|1(?:9[0128]|8[89]))|70\.106\.90|86\.87\.231)|7\.48\.6(?:6\.[24]|5\.121))|7(?:7\.10(?:6\.232\.178|8\.1\.191)|8\.(?:36\.14\.195|29\.4\.78)|4\.91\.31\.2(?:29|30)|5\.144\.81\.177|6\.72\.254\.222)|6(?:1\.(?:1(?:63\.101\.42|41\.21\.34|9\.246\.93)|98\.77\.169)|0\.(?:190\.92\.234|29\.104\.197))|5(?:8\.(?:126\.157\.18|246\.179\.82)|9\.125\.240\.239|\.79\.81\.19[56])|85\.1(?:7\.27\.110|85\.112\.8)|41\.137\.24\.4)\b)/ describe KHOP_SC_TOP200 Relay listed in SpamCop top 200 spammer IPs tflags KHOP_SC_TOP200 nopublish score KHOP_SC_TOP200 4 0 4 0 # unnecessary if DNSBLs work # spam/ham s/o corpus # 1.2552/0 1.000 20100211 # 0.8558/0 1.000 20100325 3.4 3.2 3.7 3.5 # 0.1265/0 1.000 20100329 4 0 4 0 masscheck promoted # 0.7066/0 1.000 20100401 # 0.6558/0 1.000 20100403 net # 0.6211/0 1.000 20100406 # 0.5307/0 1.000 20100409 # 0.5617/0 1.000 20100410 net # 0.3655/0 1.000 20110227@510k # 2.6827/0.0069 0.997 20130629@465k net # 2.9091/0.0056 0.998 20130705@376k # Spamhaus DROP, http://www.spamhaus.org/drop/ header KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /___ FAILED TO POPULATE ___/ describe KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP Relay listed in Spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List tflags KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP nopublish score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP 1 0.2 1 0.2 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 0.0349/0.0029 0.924 20110227@510k header KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^[^]]*___ FAILED TO POPULATE ___/ describe KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE Relay listed in Spamhaus Don't Route Or Peer List tflags KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE nopublish score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE 2 0 2 0 # adds to KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP # spam/ham s/o corpus # 0.0241/0 1.000 20110227@510k # PSBL-neighbors: any /24 with 73+ (2/7, 29%) IPs in the PSBL (not SpamCop), # as obtained from rsync://psbl-mirror.surriel.com::psbl/psbl.txt header KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ / (?:by|ip)=(?-xism:\b(?:1(?:1(?:1\.176\.(?:[67]|(?:12|8)[4567]|4[89]?|5[01]?)|6\.207\.(?:6[0123]|4[89]|5\d))|7(?:7\.(?:137\.19|36\.22)|1\.80\.1(?:7[01]|68))|8(?:1\.66\.15[67]|6\.251\.142)|03\.240\.(?:117|252)|90\.234\.10[56]|30\.193\.147|25\.60\.156)|2(?:7\.20\.(?:[89]|1(?:0[0123]?|[28][89]|[39][01]|7[6789]|1)|24[01234567]|4[0123]|5[6789])|3\.226\.18[45]|03\.191\.26|4\.244\.23)|58\.5(?:0\.1(?:[2345]|0[456789]|1\d)|4\.18[4567]))\.[012]?\d{1,2}\b)/ describe KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 Relay's IP/24 CIDR contains many PSBL hits tflags KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 nopublish score KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 2 0.6 2 0.6 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 0.5363/0 1.000 20100401 # 0.7486/0 1.000 20100402 # 0.7317/0 1.000 20100403 net run. min hosts 73->65 # 0.9316/0 1.000 20100406 # 0.9473/0 1.000 20100409 # 0.9545/0 1.000 20100410 net # 0.6985/0.0014 0.998 20110227@510k 2 .6 2 .6 # 0.4298/0 1.000 20130629@465k net # 1.0958/0 1.000 20130705@376k # test for ruleqa, 20100409, http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=/KHOP_SPAMMY meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR24 KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24||KHOP_SC_CIDR24||KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 # est. 1.2/0.0050@.996, floor: 1.0/0.0112@.989, ceiling: 1.4/0@1 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 1.2645/0.0054 0.996 20100410 net # 1.1562/0.0058 0.995 20100417 net # 1.1332/0.5023 0.693 20110227@510k # 0.5785/0 1.000 20130629@465k net # 1.5583/0 1.000 20130705@376k meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR16 KHOP_SC_CIDR16||KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 # est. 1.4/0.02@.986, floor: 1.3/0.0312@.977, ceiling: 2.0/0.0150@.993 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 1.0611/0.0009 0.999 20100410 net # 1.9539/0.0152 0.992 20100417 net # 0.5034/0 1.000 20110227@510k # 0.0140/0 1.000 20130629@465k net # 0/0 - 20130705@376k meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR8 KHOP_SC_CIDR8||KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 # est. 23.7/0.15@.994, floor: 23/0.2685@.988, ceiling: 26.5/0.0789@.997 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 23.7686/0.0614 0.997 20100410 net # 22.2300/0.0616 0.997 20100417 net # 21.0352/0.1381 0.993 20110227@510k # 5.1431/0.7565 0.872 20130629@465k net # 6.1642/1.5881 0.795 20130705@376k meta __KHOP_SPAMMY_SUBNET __KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR24||__KHOP_SPAMMY_CIDR16 # est. 26.2/0.175@.993, floor: 24.5/0.5@.980, ceiling: 30.1/0.1@.997 # spam/ham s/o corpus # 25.6744/0.0677 0.997 20100410 net, beat estimated ceiling (for ham)! # 23.7846/0.0826 0.997 20100417 net, beat ceiling ham, but beat floor spam # 23.7505/0.1041 0.996 20100418 too much ham, nixing /8, new est. 3.0/.02@.993 # 1.6366/0.5023 0.765 20110227@510k # 0.5925/0 1.000 20130629@465k net # 1.5583/0 1.000 20130705@376k # Bump these up to compensate for expected but absent overlap (94+% noted below) if (! plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval) ) score KHOP_SC_CIDR8 (0) (0.2) (0) (0.2) # BRBL(98%) score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 (0) (0.9) (0) (0.9) # BRBL(98%) score KHOP_SC_CIDR16 (0) (1.5) (0) (1.5) # BRBL(99%), PBL(98%) score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 (0) (1.7) (0) (1.7) # BRBL(99%), PBL(94%) score KHOP_SC_CIDR24 (0) (0.9) (0) (0.9) # SC(99) BRBL(96) MSPIKE(96) score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 (0) (2.5) (0) (2.5) # MSPIKE(99) SC(98) BRBL(97) ... # PSBL(97) HOSTKARMA(97) score KHOP_SC_TOP200 (0) (4.4) (0) (4.4) # SC(99) PSBL(99) ... # HOSTKARMA(99) SEMBLACK(99) BRBL(98) MSPIKE(94) score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP (0) (3) (0) (3) # SBL(78) score KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 (0) (1.5) (0) (1.5) # BRBL(98) XBL(95) endif