*** Logfile started *** on Mon Sep 5 23:14:34 2005 [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:34] Join You have joined channel #for-s. (n=diwaker@67.188.127.45) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:34] Topic The channel topic is "ForrestTuesday: XHTML2 core and Jira cleanup". [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:34] Topic Topic was set by xley on 09/05/2005 10:53:08 PM. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:34] Names End of NAMES list. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:34] Mode Channel modes: secret, no messages from outside [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:34] Created This channel was created on 09/05/2005 10:46:53 PM. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:40] hey david [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:45] looks like i'm the first one :-) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:14:54] hi Diwaker, you are [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:15:32] btw, your mail said irc.freenode.net; i had trouble connecting. i usually connect to irc.freenode.org [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:16:26] Mmmm, i connected no trouble form two separate clients. Dunno. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:17:06] yeah, no biggie [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:17:30] i'm not going to be around for most of the time though :( but i'll follow the logs later on [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:20:10] how long do you have now, what time is it for you (late at night i suppose) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:21:05] late afternoon for me [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:21:22] its 11:21pm here (i'm in northern california right now) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:21:31] i have maybe 2 hrs at most right now [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:21:58] and maybe a couple of hours at the end of the 24 hr slot [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:22:05] Join rgardler has joined this channel. (n=rgardler@ip-213-92-134-135.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:22:20] hey ross! [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:22:24] Hurray, I made it in (never used IRC before!) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:22:34] hi ross [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:22:49] Hello all, I may come and go I'm on a dodgey wireless connection [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:23:08] i am reasonably new to IRC too [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:23:25] How do I catch up (see logs)? [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:23:49] Diwaker an i didn't talk about anything of note yet [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:24:21] yeah, i walked in like 10 min back [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:24:48] i am capturing log and will upload to our "events" SVN from time-to-time [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:25:05] OK. I'm only here for about 40 mins, so I'm going to skip the pleasantries and get on with some work [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:25:20] i'm not an IRC expert, but AFAIK you can't go back and look at the logs from your IRC client [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:25:39] yes, if your connection stays up [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:26:38] I thought I would create the internal view plugin and we could start of by doing a simple XHTML2 to HTML conversion using Gavs XHTML2 page. In the meantime we need to think about what the full processing pipeline will look like [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:29:13] okay, good first step. I am re-reading your mail yesterday about whether branch or not. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:29:45] OK, I'm proceeding, but I will not commit until I get feedback from you and diwaker [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:31:51] sounds good. if you don't actively hear from me, assume lazy concensus. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:31:52] Join x-targe1 has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@d83-180-131-226.cust.tele2.es) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:07] Nick x-targe1 is now known as thorste1. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:12] hey thorsten [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:26] Nick thorste1 is now known as thorstenS. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:31] hi diwaker [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:32] :) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:38] nice meeting you [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:43] So ross, how will we give feedback [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:47] what is it [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:32:53] hey all [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:33:05] thorstenS: hi, you haven't missed anything [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:33:16] jeje [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:33:39] ross is just getting started on an internal view plugin: "I thought I would create the internal view plugin and we could start of by doing a simple XHTML2 to HTML conversion using Gavs XHTML2 page. In the meantime we need to think about what the full processing pipeline will look like" [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:33:58] Welcome Thorsten. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:34:10] hi ross [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:34:40] the only bummer is that I need to go to work :( [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:34:49] IAs diwaker said, I'm creating a new plugin as discussed. David is thinking about if it is the right approach, so I'm waiting for feedback on that. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:35:10] David - if it is "Go for it" do it here, if it is a discussion I suppose mail is better [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:35:29] Thorsten - before you go to work can you upload your partially refactored sitemaps for views to an issue for us [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:35:30] thorstenS: can you pop in later [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:35:48] sure [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:35:57] i will be online all day [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:36:22] but cannot work 100% on forrest at working hours [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:36:33] diwaker btw [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:36:41] that is good as gold :) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:36:44] cheers [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:37:04] i meant after work. I hope to stay up late tonight - it is late afternoon here now. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:37:17] just trying to learn by example :-) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:37:27] jeje [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:37:35] xley of course [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:37:46] ross +1 for the plugin [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:38:01] I have some code that needs to go in there [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:38:22] the new view dispatcher based on the lm [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:38:24] ross: we all know that plugins are the way to go, and that starting small is too, so yes. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:39:17] Perhaps someone can put this first step on the wiki page so newcomers now where we are at. I'll commit the skeleton plugin now [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:41:19] See o.a.f.plugin.internal.xhtml2 (in whiteboard) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:41:38] ok [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:41:41] svn up [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:41:59] It doesn't do anything yet, it just has Gavs example page in a samples directory. I'm about to add a pipeline and a very basic stylesheet [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:42:22] Ross: you dynamo - creating plugins in between brushing your teeth on the way to work. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:42:52] :-)) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:43:23] Join ipv6guru has joined this channel. (n=ipv6guru@203-59-250-35.dyn.iinet.net.au) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:44:29] Hi Guys, Gavin here just saying hello for the moment and recording this early conversation while at work. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:44:53] hi gav [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:45:05] hi Gavin welcome, you haven't missed much talk [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:45:48] No problem , all familiar names here I see, nice to talk at last. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:06] Hi Gavin, thanks for your XHTML page, I'm just pressing it into service :-) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:13] Join cheche has joined this channel. (n=cheche@80.174.108.189) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:13] thanks for the xhtml2.xml etc. Good start. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:21] morning! [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:29] Hola [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:46] Needs more work of course, I'll add the rest later on. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:57] muy buenas cheche [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:46:58] hola xley! [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:47:06] hey thorstenS! [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:47:14] Welcome Cheche (hey I even know what Hola means!) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:47:41] hello cheche, no idea what Hola means but I could guess [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:47:56] hey ross, I though that the only spanish that you know was " dos cervezas por favor" (two beers please...) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:48:29] Is there a better place for me to send updated xhtml2.xml file now, rather than my site. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:48:35] ipv6guru: means hello, but I guess that you knew aswell [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:49:25] we could be working over svn right? [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:49:46] I am going to start the bot program... [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:49:46] Gav: yes, do svn up, you will get a new XHTML2 internal plugin in whiteboard, the file is now in a samples directory in the content (can someone close the issue whie I add this pipeline) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:50:07] I just need a name for the bot... [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:50:42] ok will do, thanks. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:51:45] cheche: make one up? [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:52:36] is the bot just for the log? i'll have a full log as well, just in case [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:53:09] rgardler I added a locationmap to the plugin [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:53:14] hola cheche! hey gav [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:53:27] yes, we wanted to make sure we have a reliable log. I have a client log too. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:53:48] diwaker: apparently yes... [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:53:52] Join forrFerd has joined this channel. (n=forrFerd@a2125962191.net-htp.de) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:54:14] Hi Diwaker [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:54:44] diwaker: it could be a keeper for the channel.... [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:55:04] Thorsten: thanks, I just discovered the LM was missing and it caused an error - thanks (we need one in the tempalte, anyone care to log an issue for us) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:55:40] Hola ferdinand (just showing of my new skills, I can't spell the German :-(( [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:55:59] morning everybody. [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:10] ross said "in the tempalte" [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:14] Guten Tag, or something like that [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:16] what do you mean [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:18] hey ferdinand; good to see everyone here... feels like a warm coffee shop now :-) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:29] guten morgen [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:34] guten morgeb [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:38] just read my way into using irc for the first time, so bear with me [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:46] Good morning Ferdinand [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:56:48] diwaker was living in germany for while, right? [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:07] * thorstenS is walking the dogs [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:12] yeah -- 3 months interning at univ. of dortmund [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:16] back in a sec [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:24] Thorsten: I meant "in the plugin template" [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:27] though i just *could not* pick up any german beyond the regular greetings :-( [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:30] I am coming from Hamm [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:38] 20 Km from dortmund [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:57:55] thorsten: thats cool [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:58:14] ... right next to the big nuclear power plant :-) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:58:36] jeje yeah [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:58:59] I was born in Dortmund and lived there until I was 12 or so [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:59:06] * thorstenS thinks that explains well the mood swings sometimes ;-) [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:59:07] cheche : Has no-name bot started now [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:59:24] * thorstenS for him [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:59:46] I was looking for a name in the imdb for the forrest gump movie [Mon Sep 5 2005] [23:59:56] ALL: I seem to have broken my Forrest install (was doing some work on integrating blocks yesterday, broken the whole lot now :-( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:00:02] why is thorsten in italics? radiation slant? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:00:57] ./me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:01:05] without the dot [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:01:11] try it ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:01:24] ./me doing something [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:01:28] cheche: thanks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:01:35] * thorstenS doing something [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:01:54] .trying italics ... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:02:04] ./ trying again [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:02:08] All: My intention with the plugin is that we create a simple transformation from XHTML2 -> HTML as a very simple starting point, we can then think about the full processing pipeline. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:02:35] All: (sorry to not be joining in the pleasantries, I have to leave in a few minutes, I will be more relaxed when I come back) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:03:33] Join nicolaken has joined this channel. (n=chatzill@host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:03:34] All: I will add a few notes to the wiki page about what *I* thought we would do, this has not been discussed yet, so it is not meant as a set of instructions, just a suggestion [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:03:52] greetings nicola [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:03:55] Hi nicolaken [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:03:57] ciao all [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:04:16] Join JennyCurran has joined this channel. (n=eggdrop@80.174.108.189) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:04:18] Bon giorno, Nicola [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:04:49] Hi Nicola [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:04:52] I'm at work, so I will not have 100% attention... I may take minutes to respond [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:05:04] How unusual of me ;-P [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:05:15] All: We don't have a wiki page yet, will send a mail to the list [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:05:42] I should be working on my long overdue project so I'll probably just drop in and out for some code-free comments :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:07:40] Good morning, Jenny, are you a regular on the Forrest-dev list? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:08:12] forrFerd: stop flirking.... she only knows about logging.... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:08:20] is our secretary to keep notes :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:08:53] I thought IRC was doing that .... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:08:59] that was funny - ferdinand i almost made the same mistake [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:09:17] cheche :Gary Sinese played Dan Taylor, Tom Hanks played Forrest Gump, dont know the woman lead, dth? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:09:37] ipv6guru: apparenly was the girlfriend... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:09:44] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109830/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:15] Ah, Jenny , ok my bad. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:17] forrFerd: IRC does not log - your local client can be set to keep a long if you can maintain the connection. Cheche has a logger robot for us. A few of us have local logs too. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:26] I was thinking the other day... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:35] it's taking us too long now to go forward [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:43] and I asked myself... why? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:51] We have the locationmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:53] views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:11:57] xhtml2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:12:14] it seems we don't understand how to fit them all together [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:12:19] conceptually yes, but practically [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:12:24] it's a problem. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:12:28] So [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:12:40] Since we have legacy stuff lying around [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:12:50] I was thinking of starting a partial rewrite [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:12:59] - calm down, no sweat - [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:13:14] I mean rewriting the pipeline from scratch [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:13:22] bit per bit [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:13:26] by [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:13:44] writing the rules we use as we go along [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:13:56] the WD on our site could be a start [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:14:07] yeah i understood that from your email. that would be good then we can dump the rest with a sitemap cleanup later [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:14:08] that's why we need the xhtml2 document [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:14:19] xley: yup [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:14:26] +1 (see my mail to dev list, just posted) - I have to go out for 6-10 hours - Nicola is clearly thinking the sae way as I am so I'm sure I'll have lots to look at when I come back ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:14:26] so that we can build on that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:14:46] ;-) don't swear for it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:15:24] Do we have a document that explains how we want the directory structure to be? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:15:34] thanks Ross, i will call in from time-to-time throughout our night. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:15:35] or prior discussion [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:15:49] See you all soon [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:15:55] bye [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:15:57] seeya ross [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:16:13] Quit rgardler has left this server. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:16:49] nicolaken: what directory structure? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:16:58] yes, that's the question [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:00] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:03] the site [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:21] why should it matter? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:24] ya know ye old content/xdocs/etc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:38] because it will be used in the pieline we are going to write [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:44] * thorstenS need to go to work now, will be back in ca. 1 hour [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:46] are you talking about the simplification that we have talked about so often? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:46] pieline hehehe [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:50] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:17:56] nicolaken yes +1 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:18:05] was thinking of starting a partial rewrite [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:18:11] I thought that was topic for the next tuesday? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:18:18] anyone has pointers? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:18:57] you mean to that discussion? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:02] ForrFred: need that for the pipeline [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:11] In our case an old fashion skin are build by 4 different view helper [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:11] (book2menu.xsl, document2html.xsl, site2xhtml.xsl and tab2menu.xsl). In [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:11] this different files we have typically non modularized presentation [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:11] formatting logic. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:14] >ForrFred: yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:43] we need to find a way where we have a certain processing of this 4 stylesheets [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:54] I'll check my local archives and report back [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:19:56] but still be able to override parts of it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:20:36] where book2menu.xsl tells us where we are in the publication context [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:20:57] i will be back in 15 minutes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:21:12] tab2menu.xsl is dedicated for navigating the site [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:21:29] document2html.xsl is the one we have to start with [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:21:58] that is responsible for the transformation internal Format -> xhtml output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:22:21] site2xhtml is done by view and can be ignored for now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:22:22] Diretory cleanup was last discussed in a thread called [RT] Directory structure and configuration [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:22:43] forrFred: could you summarize? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:23] Here is something that I wrote to summarize the state of things [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:25] Hi Nicola, [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:27] NKB> Yes, I'm the initial author of that task :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:28] So is it agreed to implement the new structure like this: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:30] > my-project/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:31] > conf/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:34] > forrest.properties [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:35] > skinconf.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:36] > site.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:38] > tabs.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:39] > content/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:41] > status.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:42] > ** all other content [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:44] This would be a major improvement and simplification. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:45] And while we are at it, how about renaming 'conf' to 'configuration'. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:47] Doesn't seem to make a difference performance wise, does it. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:48] The same could be applied to [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:50] skinfconf.xml => skinconfiguration.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:52] site => sitestructure.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:53] but I'm not sure that this is as easy to implement or up for [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:55] discussion here. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:56] So when can we expect this to be implemented? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:23:58] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:24:00] -- [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:24:02] Ferdinand Soethe [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:24:05] * thorstenS off to work, cu later [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:24:12] Part thorstenS has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:27:16] msg ForrFerd test [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:29:38] Nicola, is this what you were looking for? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:30:29] anybody still out there? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:30:59] Part JennyCurran has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:31:02] Join JennyCurran has joined this channel. (n=eggdrop@80.174.108.189) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:31:21] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:31:26] no nicolaken kill them all :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:32:25] How? I don't feel dead yet :-) But Jenny is a bot boaring to chat with ... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:34:21] cheche: hehehe [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:34:44] forrFred: would you mind putting the above in teh forrest WD document? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:35:28] forrFred: you are correct, it's not up to discussion now, we will use this and eventually discuss it in a later talk [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:35:53] no, where can I find it, where should I put it? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:37:13] Part JennyCurran has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:37:18] Join JennyCurran has joined this channel. (n=eggdrop@80.174.108.189) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:37:59] forrest\site-author\content\xdocs\TR\2004\WD-forrest10.html [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:38:11] it's in html4 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:38:13] ok JennyCurran has my email address on the info in case people find her in touble... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:38:36] nicolaken: I think that we should not tallk too much about desing and big plans... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:38:54] instead small achivement will make people happy that they did not wasted their time [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:06] cheche: agree [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:18] nicolaken: nice... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:21] So this would be the proposed structured that I'll put in there, any objections? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:22] my-project/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:24] configuration/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:25] forrest.properties [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:27] skinconfiguration.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:28] sitestructure.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:30] tabs.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:31] content/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:33] status.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:34] ** all other content [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:39:41] in fact the next thing I intend to do is look at the xhtml2 plugin Ross has, and suggest all to do the same [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:40:01] forrFerd: we can change it later, let's start like this [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:40:11] yeah... the xhtml2 is been a lot way in our todo list.. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:40:44] forrFerd: I am -0 on that one... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:41:09] everytime we modify a name it takes a while to update code and after documentation.. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:43:30] cheche: we are doing a rewrite for xhtml2, we need a new layout... now off to look at the plugin - as soon as I have time - [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:45:12] cheche: i am worried about the disruption too [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:45:30] OK, so I won't put anything in there until ??? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:45:54] nicolaken: i am still not clear why we need a "new layout". [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:46:28] yes, I have same concerns... why do we need a "new layout"? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:47:11] 1- because the current one doesn't scale to multisites [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:47:18] 2 - because it's convoluted [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:47:21] forrFerd: using skinconf.xml instead of skinconfiguration.xml is not a need, but if you/everyone feel strong that need to be changed. then... go for it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:47:37] 3 - becasue we need to know where to get the files without the content/xodcs problems we are having [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:48:05] forrFerd: I had your same itch before but I now are back to small names, they are faster to type [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:48:05] well we agreed long time ago to have a new simplified layout. So I guess the questions is: do we need it for today, right? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:48:14] i know, but i meant: why now, why needed for today;s xhtml2 work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:48:21] just write it, it takes less than discussing it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:48:23] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:50:11] nicolaken: With any smart shell (even MS) you have file name completion so extening a name should not really be an issue, is it? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:51:49] nicolaken: Just to be clear: I won't be writing any code or change stuff like that since I don't feel up to it yet. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:52:28] So is there agreement that we need to do that changes today? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:52:48] longer names make it easier to understand for everyone I guess, shortened names less likely to be obvious of their function to users, is this the/a reason [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:55:19] ipv6guru: yes, that was the idea behind it. Moderated by the objection (in an earlier thread) that we cannot change names that make the cocoon people not feel at home in forrest anymore. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [00:57:52] ok yes, so names can not be completely different, cross-project compatibility to be maintained. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:01:38] During this lull, I take the opportunity to pack up here at work and join again later on when back at home in comfort. Bye for now. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:02:10] i too will be back in 30 minutes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:03:02] Part ipv6guru has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:07:02] well... probably you would find this funny: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:07:03] http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:10:04] cheche: lol [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:21:43] Join target-x has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:21:45] re [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:21:52] * target-x is thorsten [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:22:44] hi [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:23:08] I had a thought in the car about what nicolaken said [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:23:23] rewritting parts of the pipe [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:23:37] which wiki do we use? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:26:22] # /r no wiki, we use the dev list [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:27:06] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:27:10] cheers [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:33:12] Quit target-x has left this server. (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:36:54] Hmmm, getting awfully quiet around here. So I'm off to get some work done ... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:37:03] see ya later [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:51:45] Join target-x has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:56:12] Nick forrFerd is now known as ferdinand. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:56:46] ok, just a change of nickname [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:56:52] Join Ron_ has joined this channel. (n=rblasch@62-99-200-51.sdsl-line.inode.at) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:57:57] Nick ferdinand is now known as ferdinandS. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:58:17] hi Ron, bit quiet here at the moment, [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:58:30] Hi, yes it is. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:58:32] not much happened since Ross' email to dev@ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:59:33] and another change of nickname that can be registered [Tue Sep 6 2005] [01:59:49] Join quwiltw has joined this channel. (n=quwiltw@pcp03386307pcs.dallas01.ga.comcast.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:01:52] Nick ferdinandS is now known as ferdinandS_. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:02:58] Here's a ticket we might get closed: FOR-547 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:03:03] /msg nickserv link ferdinandS 987dsf8fH [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:03:49] Nick ferdinandS_ is now known as ferdinandS. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:04:14] Using forrest from within Ant (build.xml) failed, because I used ant-contrib-1.0b1. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:05:02] Things work fine with 1.0b2. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:05:19] Is it worth a FAQ entry, or should we simply close the ticket? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:05:38] Quit target-x has left this server. (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:09:24] reading FOR-547 ... what FAQ are you referring to? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:10:58] I was thinking about http://forrest.apache.org/docs_0_80/faq.html [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:12:17] ah, are you suggesting a new entry in that doc. I thought you refer to existing entry. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:12:45] Sorry, should have been more specific. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:12:56] no i misread. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:14:08] The situation is somewhat interesting, because most things works fine, except downloading the Forrest plugins. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:14:24] so yes probably would be worth an FAQ. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:14:32] It wasn't easy to track this down to ant-contrib. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:15:44] So, I'll come up with a few lines, and attach a patch to the issue? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:17:15] that would be great. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:19:03] Join x-targe1 has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:21:59] Join AnilRamnanan has joined this channel. (n=Anil@cuscon3427.tstt.net.tt) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:22:20] Hello everyone. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:22:22] Welcome Anil, nice to see you join us. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:22:34] yeah great hi Anil [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:22:54] thank you. it is good to be here. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:23:21] hi anil [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:23:29] Nick x-targe1 is now known as target-x. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:23:49] sorry my provide makes it hard to stay tuned [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:24:07] I do not know how much of my last messages came through [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:24:27] xley [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:24:47] looking back ... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:25:03] cheers [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:25:17] I got kicked out every minute [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:25:18] :( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:25:21] hi all, are we still trying to tackle the subtasks of FOR-184? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:25:59] Looks like 1 is complete enough to get going with 2? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:26:19] Is the idea to convert forrest:views to use XHTML2 in place or create a new plugin for that too, or what? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:26:30] nothing from T since you said "I had a thought in the car about what nicolaken said" and then discussion about dev list, then "cheers" about 90 minutes ago [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:27:11] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:27:16] quwiltw: yes to FOR-184 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:27:27] did you see Ross email to dev list? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:28:23] the thought was, that we should be able to request any step of the processing pipeline by itself [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:28:36] not like we have now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:28:50] book->tab->document->site [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:28:55] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:28:59] that is the normal one [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:29:18] but it should be possible to request: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:29:29] e.g. for index.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:30:01] index.book.xml ->gives the overall menu which is the context of the request [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:30:25] index.tab.xml -> gives the overall navigation context of the request [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:31:07] index.source.xml -> gives the document in our internal format [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:31:44] this three different request should then be agggreated by the last step of the processing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:32:27] this way we can use dynamic contracts as described in the view termilogy thread to request them in the view [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:32:29] so the request index.xml just aggregates the results of the former [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:32:38] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:32:39] why index.tab? it makes more sense to have something like index.nav.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:32:45] +1 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:32:48] cheche [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:33:39] it is kind of what we have now but the currrent situation is too heavily linked to skins [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:33:50] Join ipv6guru has joined this channel. (n=gavinmcd@203-121-204-130.e-wire.net.au) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:34:19] the benefit is that each view decides which parts it needs [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:34:30] and can easily override each part [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:34:38] Hi Guys, back again, I guess your all finished and its time for scrabble :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:34:42] target-x: I know .. but now that you are implementing new stuff, it make sense to change tab-nav [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:34:54] +1 cheche [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:35:08] what is your idea? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:35:26] uniting menu and tab to nav? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:36:14] well... it is just a though. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:36:39] a tab is a diferent representation of the possible nodes that a page can access [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:36:45] same as the menu [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:37:06] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:37:25] and is heavily connected to a document rather then a request [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:38:52] the way a see it, is that when you get a request say "/foo" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:39:22] then you as a webmaster want to get in control of what should be displayed on the tabs and on the menu [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:39:31] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:39:42] which is the navigation that should be displayed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:39:52] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:39:54] so site.xml is data [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:40:05] ipv6guru: Gav do you have log of what we are talking about here [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:40:26] and tabs or menu is just a portion of that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:41:12] actually menu and tab are just a "view" on certain parts of this navigation [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:41:22] you described [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:41:30] target-x: yes.... but I did not want to say THAT WORD !!! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:41:35] hahahahahahahhahahah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:41:37] lol [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:41:59] they are everywhere ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:43:01] no log no, started again on home computer. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:43:23] cheche JennyCurran is looging? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:43:26] cheche: can we see your logfile in real-time, otherwise i will go add "log until now" to our svn [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:43:30] target-x: yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:43:51] xley: give me a sec... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:43:55] :) you are my hero ;-) muchas gracias illo [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:43:58] i mean i would add my local log [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:49:51] coming back to what cheche said [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:50:20] the index.nav.xml is a node document [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:50:52] each node reflects another request that can be made [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:51:13] now thinking in java [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:52:09] each node can be resolved through the index.nav.xml and as well "neighbor" relations [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:52:47] A possible limiter for requesting certain nodes is in my eyes a contract [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:53:26] a contract can requests the whole node list or only parts of this [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:54:03] this requests should be done via cocoon:/ and/or lm:{} [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:54:39] that makes it possible to have project specific implementations of node-limiters (aka menu/tab) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:55:53] besides it opens the possibility to use e.g. java classes to process this node-limiter [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:56:24] cheche: > so site.xml is data [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:56:25] yes though of a slightly differnt kind then the document itself. It is site-structure data and quite often maintained by different people (editors) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:57:18] ferdinandS IMO editor are the people providing content [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:57:45] there can be other people that make the collection (aka site.xml) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:58:08] placing the content in the overall context [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:58:35] I reckon you as book writer have some example [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:58:47] for that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [02:59:11] I remember you mentioned something like this at the Con in your presentation [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:03:35] i guess i was looking for more concrete todo items such as: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:03:47] 1) Enable views in the new plugin? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:03:50] target-x: A common definition is: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:03:51] authors or content writers are people who always write the individual pages. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:03:53] editors (in German Redakteure) are the people who review the content, improve on it and place it somewhere within the documentation. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:03:55] David quite often takes that editor role when checking and reworking a donated piece of docs, splitting it if needed etc. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:03:56] Now with small Forrests author and editor may be the same person. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:04:21] agree [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:04:21] 2) create a xthml22html.xsl (the stylesheet ross mentioned in his email) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:04:38] quwiltw start with point 2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:04:53] 3) make views work off of #2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:05:31] if you done ;-) then look in the lm of the new internal.xhtml2 plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:05:32] quwiltw: we need to also design the internal pipelines (complex task) which i think is what Thorsten and Cheche started talking about. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:05:34] 4) Modify pipeline to allow new fname.*.xml style requests [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:06:21] ferdinandS thanks for that explanation [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:06:38] xley: that'll feed my #4 that i just added (shouldn't say modify i suppose) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:06:38] xley target-x: http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/forrest.log.06Sep2005 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:06:44] yes 2) is good to start. Can google find a generic and basic xhtml2html.xsl ? Would that help? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:07:00] I know that it is possible to create a live log... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:07:11] quwiltw the lm contains the refactored view dispatcher that need to be activated [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:07:22] cheche gracias [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:07:24] :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:07:34] beauty cheche , sorry to drag you off from the discussion but that will be good for later today. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:08:26] yes beauty [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:08:48] xley that is not a problem.. I know that I had it setup with live html output... but I can not remember how I did it... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:08:52] quwiltw are you want to work on your point 2.? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:09:30] doesn't matter... just woke up really early so i want to do something;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:09:40] point 2 is as good as any [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:09:47] go for it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:09:54] it is a basic starting point [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:10:08] we will need your work later on today [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:10:45] ok, we'll see how far i get. i'll have to do "real" work at some point this morning though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:11:21] meanwhile, was #1 not correct? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:12:12] can the xhtml22html.xsl be tested on the xhtml2.xml, want to know if it works ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:12:47] #1 is correct if you brave enough ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:12:58] cheche: plain log is fine [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:13:31] ipv6: i hope so, that's what i was planning ot use to get something working;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:13:45] anyway that is as well determine by discussion of the internal pipes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:14:22] views will have to adapt then. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:15:19] quwiltw : cool, I'll keep a close eye on progress, let me know if I can do anything [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:15:35] target-x: i'm just talking enabling via forrest.properties. i'm still not quite sure how this pipeline redesign can be accomplished without a) breaking views for a little while or b) starting to bring views into core [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:15:39] ... and I'll let you know if I can :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:17:00] ipv6guru: we are doing as we go, not really sure what the actual jobs are. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:17:12] quwiltw->who are you? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:17:28] tim? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:17:35] ah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:17:36] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:17:41] then do 1 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:17:53] it is just changing some props [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:22] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:27] Back to be doing some work ... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:32] and a) and b) are fine [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:36] sorry i should have mentioned that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:39] b) is the goal [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:45] no worries [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:58] my x-chat client allows me to right-click and see real names - mine is exposed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:18:59] just to know whether you have commit access ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:19:31] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:19:41] yeah right mine too thx ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:21:06] how will we detect that we have xhtml2 input to deal with? I was expecting to use the SourceTypeAction (like in forrest.xmap) to detect the xhtml2 namespace [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:21:53] quwiltw I have another todo [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:21:54] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:22:06] SourceTypeAction is not yet working in the lm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:22:13] as long as it's *yours* go ahead;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:22:34] the @src is not processed correctly [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:22:36] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:22:52] lm? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:22:58] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:23:04] locationmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:23:05] umm... that's not good [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:23:12] how so [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:23:21] to activate it? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:23:37] 1moment [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:23:55] google turned up this; might this be used instead as a quickie solution to be potentially redone later? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:24:15] http://etherealwake.com/style/xhtml2html.xslt [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:26:14] looks cool [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:26:24] xley can you check the license? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:03] quwiltw [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:05] Index: org/apache/forrest/locationmap/lm/ActNode.java [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:06] =================================================================== [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:06] --- org/apache/forrest/locationmap/lm/ActNode.java (revision 278927) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:06] +++ org/apache/forrest/locationmap/lm/ActNode.java (working copy) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:06] @@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:06] import org.apache.avalon.framework.service.ServiceSelector; [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:06] Quit target-x has left this server. (Excess Flood) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:11] it's still under heavy dev too but might be good to get us kick-started, yeah I'm not good with license [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:27:37] Join x-targe1 has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:28:18] quwiltw if you want to tackle lm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:28:24] target your last dropped out after the import org.apache.ava... line [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:28:27] org/apache/forrest/locationmap/lm/ActNode.java [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:28:34] I know [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:28:35] :( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:28:54] anyway if you keen to fix it that is where I stoped [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:29:23] I think it breaks actions because it now expects a @src [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:29:33] I can check it in [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:29:37] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:29:38] if you want [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:29:39] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:29:45] ok will do [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:30:31] what will repeat the problem? our new plugin locationmap.xml? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:30:32] Quit ferdinandS has left this server. ("Chatzilla 0.9.68.5.1 [Firefox 1.0.6/20050716]") [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:30:59] yeah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:34:00] Quit x-targe1 has left this server. (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:34:35] quwiltw: the license is okay for that XSLT etherealwake.com [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:35:12] shucks, that was easy... next... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:41:19] that sxlt, not checked but will it handle new xhtml2 elements [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:41:53] back in 10 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:04] Join x-targe1 has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:07] (12:39:12) x-targe1: quwiltw [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:07] (12:39:26) x-targe1: it is cheched in [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:07] (12:39:37) x-targe1: I will be silent for a while [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:08] (12:39:46) x-targe1: need to finish some work first [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:08] (12:39:58) x-targe1: scream if you need help ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:08] (12:41:03) x-targe1: arg [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:10] (12:41:05) x-targe1: wait [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:17] Nick x-targe1 is now known as target-x. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:25] dinner time: me too back soon [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:34] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:43] almost breakfast time.... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:46] :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:43:57] i fixed my last commit [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:44:13] now you are good to go [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:44:32] I have problems with my provider like you can see from the log [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:44:54] :( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:45:08] * target-x now doing some work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:45:26] Nick target-x is now known as target-silent. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:48:52] Quit target-silent has left this server. (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:52:55] Join gregor has joined this channel. (n=gregor@apache/committer/gregor) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:56:52] i should have known it wouldn't have been that easy [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:57:26] that transform expects xhtml namespaces, should we have an xhtml namespace on our sample doc? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:58:25] ... etc. ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:59:07] Join x-targe1 has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:59:31] hi gregor [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:59:39] Nick x-targe1 is now known as target-x. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:59:43] target-x: did you see my last question? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [03:59:59] no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:00:10] i got kicked out again :( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:00:28] that transform expects xhtml namespaces, should we have an xhtml namespace on our sample doc? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:00:40] ... etc. ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:01:16] moment [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:01:19] I think no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:01:29] you mean for the sourcetypeaction? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:01:41] or the transformer? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:01:58] the transformer [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:02:27] Use standard namespaces [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:02:34] xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:02:39] in the sample doc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:02:55] that should do the trick [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:04:06] that's what's there. the stylesheet that i found matches based on a xhtml namespace -- i'll change the stylesheet for now but this is a really temporary solution [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:04:33] hm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:04:36] gregor [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:04:45] are you listening [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:05:22] I saw that quwiltw [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:06:01] mabe we should change the xsl instead? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:06:04] wdyt? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:06:30] yeah that's what i was trying to say... i'll change the xslt for now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:06:47] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:07:18] I was hoping that gregor knew a smarter solution [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:07:27] he is an expert on that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:07:54] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:07:59] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:08:09] http://etherealwake.com/style/xhtml2html.xslt [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:08:23] uses standard xhtml:bla to match [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:08:48] we just declared xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2" in our sample doc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:08:53] that is not matching [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:09:05] are there a smart workaround [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:09:08] ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:09:26] Join target has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:09:31] Part target has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:09:57] you could additionally bind it to the default ns in the xsl [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:10:07] how? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:10:22] add xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2" at the top [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:10:28] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:10:40] quwiltw did you copy? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:10:47] thanks gregor :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:11:03] well, lets see if it works :) ns can be a bitch [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:11:04] yep, trying it now thanks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:12:29] that stylesheet also claims to emit xhtml 1.0 but emits html 4 actually [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:12:57] :) you are the ns wiz ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:13:20] unless this is the last stylesheet in the transform chain, not so good: presumably the html 4 step is done by the serializer, yes? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:14:20] ye [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:14:30] we need to strip that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:22:35] Join target has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:22:40] Part target has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:24:35] Quit ipv6guru has left this server. (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:28:56] Join ipv6guru has joined this channel. (n=gavinmcd@203-121-204-130.e-wire.net.au) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:29:30] did my .css question get through before my cut-off ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:32:09] no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:35:15] Ok, the xample xhtml.sml points to w3.org's stylesheet of xhtml2.css, do we use this and alter it or create new one? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:36:25] Another question, the xhtml2html.xslt seems to be for xhtml 1 and 1.1 , I see no new xhtml2 elements in there, such as and others. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:37:39] such as and [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:37:59] maybe I'm just being thick and its done another way [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:38:44] 13:12:30) gregor: that stylesheet also claims to emit xhtml 1.0 but emits html 4 actually [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:38:54] xample xhtml.sml == sample xhtml.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:39:10] Ok, the xample xhtml.sml points to w3.org's stylesheet of xhtml2.css, do we use this and alter it or create new one?-> we do not need css for that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:40:13] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:40:38] it is our internal format [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:40:40] ipv6: where is document, header, abstract coming from? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:40:44] css is theming [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:41:32] should it be: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:41:37] document->html [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:41:43] header->head [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:41:43] ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:44:22] I changed the content from an index.xml file [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:45:49] so they should be changed, right? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:47:09] pleeeeeeease log in with a nickname I can understand, like the email name... I just came back to take a peek and I don't understand a thing! :-P [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:47:44] who are you talking about [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:47:51] I would say so yes, in the index.xml when that is transformed into index.html I thought they were converted too. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:48:14] target-x: everyone! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:48:15] Nick ipv6guru is now known as Gav. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:48:20] :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:49:16] nicolaken : Not that my name would mean anything, but is changed. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:49:47] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:49:58] I am always traget something [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:50:10] Nick target-x is now known as thorste1. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:50:20] how ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:50:22] now you know why [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:50:34] ./nick bla [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:50:38] Join dee_23 has joined this channel. (n=dp@pd95b1a9b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:50:38] wihtout dot [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:51:38] Nick quwiltw is now known as twilliams. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:52:07] Nick thorste1 is now known as tscherler. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:52:30] hi david aka dee_23 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:53:12] hi thorsten [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:53:30] Nick xley is now known as crossley. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:54:00] nicolaken: good point [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:54:08] Nick twilliams is now known as twilliams_. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:54:58] so is " href="http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/style/xhtml2.css"?> [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:55:27] being removed from xhtml2.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:55:33] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:55:39] that is obsolet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:55:40] Cocoon doesn't use it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:55:51] nor xml:output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:56:09] the other thing it is our internal format [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:56:09] xsl:output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:56:27] REGISTER twilliams_ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:56:57] yes, internal, but even with xhtml2 as input not used [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:57:00] twilliams_ you forgot /msg NickServ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:57:52] ok, so wheres the css styling being done, do you have a location. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:57:58] thanks, my irc skills are very poor obviously [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:58:16] no worries I am still learning as well [Tue Sep 6 2005] [04:58:34] twilliams_ -> I cheat, I got widgets on my mIRC client [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:08:55] Quit AnilRamnanan has left this server. (Read error: 113 (No route to host)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:10:30] what namespace and schema location is being used? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:17:08] i assume what you've got in the sample file [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:17:38] me too, i have that enabled in my local copy for my experiements [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:18:37] i'm having no luck with that xslt .. i'll give it a few more minutes and then start on our own [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:18:58] using document2html as a model [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:19:50] Ok, thats fine, I was assuming they would need changing sometime, I thought relaxNG was being used, this is different to w3.org schema [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:20:40] twilliams: okay, i am just starting to try the etherealwake xslt [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:21:25] Gav: we will be using RNG in the core. Did you see my commits of the "validation" transformer today? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:22:18] has anyone validated our sample doc against RNG in appendix B? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:22:37] i have removed the document type declaration from your xhtml2_subset.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:22:54] twilliams: that is something that i want to do today. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:24:03] you commiting the sample sans dtd decl? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:24:10] crossley : I see it now, thanks. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:25:38] I think Ross renamed it for the whiteboard, is this its new name now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:25:44] twilliams: not yet, i am in the middle of trying various things. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:25:51] Gav: yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:28] Quit gregor has left this server. (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:28] Quit crossley has left this server. (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:28] Quit twilliams_ has left this server. (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:28] Quit xley2 has left this server. (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:28] Quit tscherler has left this server. (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:28] Quit Ron_ has left this server. (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:28] Quit cheche has left this server. (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:34] Join crossley has joined this channel. (n=crossley@static-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:34] Join tscherler has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:34] Join gregor has joined this channel. (n=gregor@apache/committer/gregor) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:34] Join twilliams_ has joined this channel. (n=quwiltw@pcp03386307pcs.dallas01.ga.comcast.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:34] Join Ron_ has joined this channel. (n=rblasch@62-99-200-51.sdsl-line.inode.at) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:34] Join cheche has joined this channel. (n=cheche@80.174.108.189) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:34] Join xley2 has joined this channel. (n=crossley@static-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:35] Mode irc.freenode.net gives channel operator privileges to crossley. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:30:54] still here? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:31:40] wow, 7 of you quit in one go [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:32:07] all back again by the looks of it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:34:09] somebody pulled the plug ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:34:35] that cable under the atlantic I bet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:35:59] so are new required for new xhtml2 elements or not? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:38:45] see twilliams comments about 20 minutes ago [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:41:01] crossley: you have any luck with this ethereal xsl? I'm fed up and ready to go it alone. I should be able to very quickly get something that is usable. We can work on completeness later, wdyt? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:41:58] yes good do that. I am not sure what your problem is with the ethereal xsl? Can you briefly explain? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:43:16] it's apparently not matching anything... it basically just removes all tags and sends everything out as text [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:43:36] ah yeah, that is what i am seeing too. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:44:48] it's probably something simple but i think i'd rather get something simple working than to find a bug in a stylesheet that will only be temporary anyway [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:45:05] lemme have a look [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:47:06] one question [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:47:19] do you see Id: xhtml2html.xslt 127 2004-11-14 03:06:21Z etherealwake $ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:47:29] as comment in your output? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:48:12] no that's not even coming through. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:48:18] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:48:27] i added a root match to no avail either [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:49:08] that means that the does not match [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:49:31] even with it is not working? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:49:39] right [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:49:57] just wait to get it straight [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:50:11] please add: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:50:31] grr [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:50:42] does this come through? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:50:48] sorry, should have clarified, that will come through [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:50:56] ah ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:51:01] ...although i did HELLO WORLD instead of grr [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:51:07] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:51:24] i added an apply templates from there so that i knew I was getting through but nothing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:51:54] then the stuff get not matched [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:07] nope [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:12] is your local copy the same as in trunk? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:14] even with gregor's suggestion [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:21] the stylesheet? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:25] no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:26] it's not in trunk [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:32] the base doc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:52:37] example [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:53:02] pretty much. i removed the doctype decl and uncommented the schema. other than that it's the same [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:53:27] i've tried it with and without doctype though -- that's just how mine happens to look at them moment [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:54:26] wait I think i know what is goin on [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:54:58] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/forrest/trunk/whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2/src/documentation/content/xdocs/samples/xhtml2_subset.xml?r1=278982&r2=278983&rev=278983&view=diff&diff_format=l [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:55:17] if the namespace is not declared in the root element it cannot work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:55:27] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:55:31] should be [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:55:40] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:55:51] i have the namespace exposed in my local copy and still no good. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:55:59] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:13] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:16] right, i'm using that commented out html root w/namespace [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:16] sure [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:21] because: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:35] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:46] xhtml instead of html [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:53] that is not the same [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:56:59] try a small hack [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:57:17] change [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:57:22] to [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:57:30] ="bla" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:57:46] and try again [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:58:47] no luck here, that xhtml is for the namespace not the root element though, correct? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:59:05] yes and no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:59:20] if you do the gregor head on the xsl [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:59:29] declaring a default namespace [Tue Sep 6 2005] [05:59:50] yes i did that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:00:00] then the root element of the default namespace is the prefix [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:00:11] which is in our case html [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:00:43] now changing the sample docs root element to xhtml ... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:00:55] should work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:03:04] but "The element is the root element for all XHTML Family Document Types." [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:03:29] "should work"... ;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:03:37] yes, that why I said a smal hack [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:03:43] ah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:03:44] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:04:03] ...I guess it does not? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:04:57] twilliams: getting close to your suggestion to dump it and start our own. Gav might be able to help with that. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:05:23] just search and replace xhtml: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:05:29] with nothing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:06:25] that causes negative progress;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:06:31] not even the text comes out now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:06:41] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:07:27] if someone wants to pick this ethereal thing up then they can. I'm ready to just get something simple working for now so that we can later get to proving out the pipelines, etc. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:07:27] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:07:57] and xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2"> [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:08:06] does not work after stripping? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:08:08] yah, though i had them reversed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:10:43] what about : [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:10:43] xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:10:43] xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:10:43] xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2"> [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:11:19] ignore first line, thats obvious [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:11:37] get rid of all the "exclude-result-prefixes" and stuff [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:22:14] was exclude-result-prefixes taken out of the xslt file too then [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:23:34] that's where he was suggesting removing it i believe [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:26] one more shoot in the dark [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:28] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:28] Hello world [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:28] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:28] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:28] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:28] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:40] what gives that? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:24:52] adding it to the stylesheet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:25:05] and yes Gav twilliams is right [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:26:19] of course having [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:26:21] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:26:21] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:26:21] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:26:26] in it as well [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:27:01] I wish I would have time. *grr* [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:27:48] Quit twilliams_ has left this server. (Remote closed the connection) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:30:24] Join twilliams_ has joined this channel. (n=twilliam@pcp03386307pcs.dallas01.ga.comcast.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:31:49] dropped off, did you have any other ideas after that copy-of? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:33:20] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:33:30] then th html stuff get matched [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:33:32] now try [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:33:47] dropped off ->means working, or not? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:34:26] ooops... "dropped off" means that i dropped off the IRC channel - network issue at my house;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:34:48] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:34:53] actually I had changed the match="html" to be match="/" that's how i got that to match [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:34:55] yeah sorry I saw [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:04] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:12] try both [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:18] (15:26:21) tscherler: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:18] (15:26:21) tscherler: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:18] (15:26:21) tscherler: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:30] and then the match="html" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:46] I want to see what happends [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:35:52] tried that, nothing beyond root "/" will match [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:06] tscherler: i tried your two suggestions but still getting the same - only plain text output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:08] and match="html:hmtl" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:14] grr [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:25] with html: declared? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:32] as xhtml2? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:36] i thought it might be a namespace mismatch since i notice that there is a trailing slash on our xml file's namespace but i fixed that with no success [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:49] it is ns [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:36:55] that is for sure [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:37:22] no namespaces, both default namespace for the xml and xsl are the same now so no need for it in the match's [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:37:45] i've still got your find-n-replace xhtml: w/ "" from before [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:38:50] ah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:39:14] still give it a go please [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:40:43] ok no luck [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:41:39] then I would say screw it ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:41:54] and do let us do it ourself [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:42:17] you can use the templates and change them as we need [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:42:19] wdyt? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:42:41] twilliams [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:42:54] you said the copy-of worked right? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:42:55] i'd prefer to just remove it from my system, start with document2html as a model and completely role our own [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:43:20] so that we don't need to keep his license around [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:43:35] yes, on a match="/" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:43:48] parse me the first 3 lines please [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:44:09] huh? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:44:36] of the output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:44:45] here in this irc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:45:12] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:45:13] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:45:13] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:45:13] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:45:50] and your template [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:05] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:06] $Id: xhtml2html.xslt 127 2004-11-14 03:06:21Z etherealwake $ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:06] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:06] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:06] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:06] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:28] ok the 5 lines of the output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:59] Do we need to incorporate this somewhere ?--> [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:59] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:46:59] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:47:00] XHTML 2 Template Page [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:47:00] A document detailing (almost) all of the existing and new xhtml2 elements. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:47:02] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:47:11] skipping the licensing stuff in the source file [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:47:16] that also came through [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:47:27] ah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:51:12] ok then i made a mistake [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:51:59] bla [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:52:25] or bla [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:53:03] and instead of use [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:53:37] now we're getting somewhere [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:53:48] ...not completely sure where... but somewhere;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:53:53] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:54:01] I hope not a deadend ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:54:12] which one match? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:54:21] better ask does it match? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:55:33] match="html:head" matches [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:55:45] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:56:11] now i'll go back to the original xsl and do a find/replace xhtml: with html: and it should work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:56:19] +1 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:56:20] :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:56:29] my progress will be slowed for a few with crying baby;( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [06:56:29] thanks for being so patient [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:00:49] success.... finally... thanks much [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:01:00] to you [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:01:01] :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:01:11] good to hear [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:03:06] is there anything special i need to do when checking in stuff like this that's under a different license? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:03:17] no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:04:02] read the license, it is fine ... there are no conditions that go beyond the Apache License [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:04:49] perhaps say where it came from in the 'svn log' or add a comment to the actual file. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:05:28] ok, i just didn't know if we keep a central pointer to anything not ASF2.0 licensed or not [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:06:08] Part nicolaken has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:06:31] Join nicolaken has joined this channel. (n=chatzill@host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:06:40] no we don't. With jars we put a license, next to the jar with the same filename. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:07:59] Join target has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:08:29] Nick tscherler is now known as away. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:08:31] with this, we meet the three conditions just by leaving the license header in place [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:08:49] Part away has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:09:55] ok thanks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:10:12] Nick target is now known as tscherler. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:14:48] what's a URL to exercise the locationmap problem? (e.g. http://localhost:8888/someurl) I saw your pipe commit but don't know how to request it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:15:05] wait [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:17:27] Join ferdinandS has joined this channel. (n=ferdinan@a2125952123.net-htp.de) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:24:59] getView-index [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:25:12] http://localhost:8888/getView-index [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:25:59] twilliams [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:26:20] you need to change the generator [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:26:45] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:27:01] ok, i get a cocoon not found error on that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:27:22] (16:26:51) tscherler: ->on that? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:28:24] nope, mine had lm:views{1} instead of getView, i'll redeploy and try again [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:28:42] yeah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:28:45] my fault [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:28:49] I just saw [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:28:52] sorry [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:30:36] Quit ferdinandS has left this server. ("Chatzilla 0.9.68.5.1 [Firefox 1.0.6/20050716]") [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:31:49] still a resource not found error, what was the error message you got? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:33:00] nevermind, i see it in the log file [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:35:07] ähm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:35:16] depends on how you try it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:35:29] are you doing forrest run in the new plugin? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:35:39] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:36:57] hmm wiered [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:38:19] i see the src attribute error in the log file; just a resource not found to the browser [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:38:29] were you getting a more meaningful error to the browser? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:39:22] Either way, you're passing an empty source string to the SourceTypeAction and it don't like that. I'll try to see what the SourceTypeAction is looking for in that parameter and see if I can figure out how to get it what it wants [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:39:42] ActNode line114 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:41:37] Quit Ron_ has left this server. ("Chatzilla 0.9.68a [Firefox 1.0.6/20050722]") [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:41:39] Nick tscherler is now known as tscherler_eating. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:42:13] i think tscherler is having too much fun with this nick renaming thing;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:42:15] I normally use eclipse [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:42:36] no actually I have not eaten jet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:42:42] I am starving marvin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:42:53] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:43:15] wow, i'm surprised that phrase is international [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:43:18] I start forrest in debug mode and then connect with eclipse in debbug mode [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:43:36] (16:43:22) twilliams_: wow, i'm surprised that phrase is international-> too much South park [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:43:41] I am big fan ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:43:51] ahh... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:44:05] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:44:17] I will be afk for eat [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:45:19] yeah, i haven't gotten into eclipse -- too steep a learning curve for me i suppose. it's almost like one has to "think eclipse" before they "get it" -- not so different than Cocoon i suppose [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:46:19] tim i see your commit of xhtml2html.xsl has changed some stuff in the stylesheet. Probably should commit the original, then make the changes. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:47:12] dude tim [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:47:13] yep, didn't even think about that, sorry... i don't know how to revert an add though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:47:43] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:47:58] does that exist in your project? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:48:19] I am unsure whether I as well commited {project:theme-sourcetypeDir} [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:48:24] moment [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:48:30] yes i've got that one [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:49:29] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:49:33] how come? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:49:42] i have not committ it ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:50:22] a little frightening i must admin... but it's there with a "Sourcetype-based" comment above it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:50:43] twilliams: 'svn delete; svn add' i wonder. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:52:51] suppose it doesn't matter too much if it is temporary and we are going to remove it. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:53:13] twilliams I commited that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:53:18] now I am off eating [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:54:39] i have some RELAX NG validation happening now locally, using xmllint [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:55:24] our samples/xhtml2_subset.html almost gets there [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:57:13] I spotted errors , should be [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:57:33] @all svn up [Tue Sep 6 2005] [07:57:51] I checked in other stuff that was sitting on my hard drive [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:01:44] Gav: i needed to remove the trailing slash from xmlns attribute on element [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:03:55] yep, I see it, thanks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:05:44] i will fix the file in svn whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2/src/documentation/content/xdocs/samples/xhtml_subset.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:07:21] I have to go, back in 6 hours, will this still be going on then? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:08:13] crossley : can you replace the error while your there [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:08:40] Dunno, hope so. The day is twenty-four hours. I am going to bed soon and will check in tomorrow morning [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:08:49] yes Gav will do. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:08:59] ok cheers [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:09:22] Nick Gav is now known as Gav-. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:09:25] see ya [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:09:30] cya [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:09:57] Nick Gav- is now known as Gav_Zzzzz. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:23:58] Nick tscherler_eating is now known as tscherler. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:30:45] Quit tscherler has left this server. (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [08:46:35] Join target has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:06:12] exit [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:06:18] me goes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:06:24] bye [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:06:26] cia [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:06:27] o [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:06:29] o [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:06:38] Part nicolaken has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:13:28] did you crreate nodes for sourcetype and document-declaration? or how ido they get to the SourceTypeAction? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:18:19] (18:13:35) twilliams_: did you crreate nodes for sourcetype and document-declaration? or how ido they get to the SourceTypeAction?->me, hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:18:33] I cannot remember [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:19:01] what does a svn blame say? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:19:25] Nick target is now known as tscherler. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:23:40] i don't see nodes for them (e.g. SourceTypeNode, DocumentDeclarationNode but didn't know if you just hadn't checked them in yet. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:24:17] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:24:26] I check all my java stuff [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:24:28] in [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:24:39] that is matbe the bug ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:25:10] bug? beast maybe;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:25:15] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:25:43] btw you get the hack crown for the first tuesday [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:26:01] AFAIK you get nothing for free with locationmaps. syntax mimics sitemap but grammar has to be implemented [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:26:19] yeah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:26:29] that kind of sucks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:26:36] a crown for chasing my tail? wow [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:27:05] because we ending up to imitate all the grammars [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:27:19] I had two time implementations [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:27:22] yeah, i suggested a while back that we should implement locationmap as a formal language just like sitemap so that it's known how to expand it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:27:44] but folks didn't think it'd grow that much [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:27:45] a crown for chasing my tail? -> jeje at least you chased the tail. ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:27:58] hmm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:28:12] I cannot remember [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:28:39] but I thought the same when implementing the actions [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:29:10] you know, that discussion may have been on the cocoon-users@ list [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:29:51] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:30:14] tail -f chase.tim(); [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:30:18] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:31:37] man roadblocks everywhere... simple transform, simple locationmap... perhaps we weren't mean to be productive today [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:32:00] I have not started yet ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:32:50] ...but looking on the bug at work you may be right [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:34:08] there's also the lack of the src attribute on your recursivedirectiorytraversal "act" node too but it seems to be happy with junk being passed to it for now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:34:19] no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:34:27] that is the actual problem [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:34:35] the @src has to be optional [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:34:44] but it drove me crazy [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:34:54] it was either or [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:35:05] either you have one then for all actions [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:35:25] or you do not have one then as well for all actions [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:35:46] I thought about getParameter("bla",null); [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:36:07] but AFAIR that did not work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:38:15] that is the actual problem -> that's one of the actual problems;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:43:16] ok ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:43:36] What's the time for you? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:43:57] 12:42pm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:44:13] 18:44:05 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:44:24] 6 hours [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:44:29] east cost [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:44:33] ¿? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:44:40] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=25 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:45:11] germany? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:45:30] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=321 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:45:49] born there live in seville [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:47:26] i'm going to have to get some real work done pretty soon.. i'll listen in and be back this evening. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:49:02] i think that we should consider this locationmap-Action problem later and focus on the xhtml2 for now. it appears it's just used for fallback capability and we'll get that workin in the coming days. wdyt? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:51:07] actually the fallback wasworking fine till i played with the ressourcetype action [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:51:14] yes do not worry [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:51:20] I will overtake that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:51:28] whithin an hour [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:52:55] just check in what you have [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:53:04] I will take careof the rest [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:53:23] if you want comment the code and add some hints [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:53:25] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:54:22] umm.. i don't have anything. other than a better undertsanding of how these actions are supposed to work;) but that's not helping you:( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:54:58] the actions take care of their own children and need to be configured [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:55:09] that's Configured in terms of the lifecycle [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:55:21] i'm not sure if that's being done [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:57:03] another wild goose chase, they're being configured properly [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:57:30] but that's not helping you -> it does [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:57:32] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:57:54] one more pair of eyes to watch [Tue Sep 6 2005] [09:58:14] that is more then we can hope for ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:27:53] where in the new pipeline will this xhtml2html stylesheet be used? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:28:23] notsure [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:28:49] index.source.xml I guess [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:29:57] that should return the real source (i.e. the XHTML2 data) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:31:40] what source data are the view templates working against now? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:32:57] document2xhtml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:54:48] I am going home cu u all later [Tue Sep 6 2005] [10:55:28] Part tscherler has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:00:34] Quit dee_23 has left this server. ("Verlassend") [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:21:20] Join rgardler has joined this channel. (n=rgardler@ip-213-92-134-135.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:21:44] Wow, there are still loads of folk here (sorry I'm late) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:24:25] mostly just hanging out -- don't get too excited;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:24:56] I'm just looking at the commits, has anyone kept a wiki log of what has been discussed/decided? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:24:57] thorsten went home, probably be back up any time now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:25:26] No. JennyCurran is logging this session I think though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:25:47] Not much has been done/decided anyway though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:27:53] Well, I've been doing a roll out all day - very boring (I really should leave some bugs in so I have something to do on these days). I'm raring to get some really work done [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:29:53] i wasn't sure where we were heading with your xhtml2html stylesheet but it's in svn now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:30:26] Who's stylesheet? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:30:32] i found one online that [after much thorsten help] we were able to get working [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:30:52] i say "your's" because the one that you mentioned in your email this morning [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:30:55] OK, I was just looking at the site, I can't find any license info, I assume it was checked? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:31:07] david checked it for me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:31:22] Cool - I always trust David on such things ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:31:38] OK, did you folk have any discussion about what the processing pipeline should look like? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:32:04] umm... it was discussed at some point... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:32:18] ... my eyes glazed over about mid-way through though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:32:34] cheche and thorsten got to going [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:32:48] difficult for me to keep up [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:33:25] I think david is logging this locally so if he gets back before cheche he can probably get you a log of that too [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:33:55] Are we epecting David back - it's real late in Aus. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:34:02] they were basically re-hashing much of what's in the TR it seemed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:34:26] i think he said he would check back in the morning... i didn't look to see what that meant [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:34:47] Oh, OK. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:35:04] 5:34 there now, a couple hours maybe [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:35:36] I just did "svn up" and am looking at the XHTML2 plugin. I am not seeing a themed site, the CSS appears to be missing is that a local problem to me? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:35:56] no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:36:00] that's what it is [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:36:19] OK, so I best fix that then. Any ideas, or shall I just look to see what I see? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:36:38] wait [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:36:52] are you talking about the whole site or just that xhtml2_subset file? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:37:21] right now, I'm just talking about the index page [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:37:41] somethings goofed then [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:37:57] At my end? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:38:06] (meaning you see it OK) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:38:35] meaning it *should* be a regular view-enabled site [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:38:52] i did enable views, i assume you've local-deplooyed them? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:40:08] yeah, i just svn-up'd re-deployed and it looks fine [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:40:12] Part gregor has left this channel. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:40:31] Yes, I think so (I'll redeploy) I notice a couple of params are missing - testing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:41:14] rebuilding forrest might also help [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:41:42] i've done some locationmap tinkering today for a SourceTypeAction issue that thorsten was seeing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:42:10] although that shouldn't really have affected this [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:43:31] I'm getting some really strange errors - I'm going to test on a basic views site. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:50:42] Quit rgardler has left this server. (Remote closed the connection) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:52:13] Join rgardler has joined this channel. (n=rgardler@ip-213-92-134-135.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:52:52] (I'm on a dodgy wireless connect so I will keep dropping out - this means I missed anything said in the last 5 minutes, anything directed at me should be repeatred) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:08] Tim, can you do a test for me... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:14] sure [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:23] Go to the viewHelper plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:26] do forrest run [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:30] and i'm the only one talking right now so i'll make sure you're online;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:31] and localhost:8888 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:41] ...since you'll be the only one listening too;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:53:47] :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:54:32] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:54:45] i've got the vhiewhelper.xhtml project running [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:55:29] Damn! I get an error about needing a transformer before a generator??? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:55:36] I'll do a clean checkout [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:55:57] did you svn up the whole project? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:57:47] Yes, but I was doing some really strange stuff over the last couple of days trying to get Cocoon forms to work - I suspect I did something bad. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:58:09] I'm doing a totally clean checkout [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:58:19] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:58:42] So, I'll review the TR and try and work the logic of the pipeline out [Tue Sep 6 2005] [12:59:37] ok, after i got the stylesheet working i just didn't know why it was necessary [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:00:19] :-) - maybe it isn't... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:00:25] i guess i thought that views are doing that internalstructure->html transform in pieceparts [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:00:41] no, you're not supposed to tell me that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:00:55] you're supposed to go on about a big picture you had in mind;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:01:10] ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:01:37] :-) you got it. I always like to make something work first, getting a page to display a complete set of our subset means that we can then chop it up into the views - exactly as you suggest [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:02:12] Since views remove the need for all the body-** type matches [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:02:28] we can start by feeding the full subset into an stylesheet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:02:31] see it render [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:02:47] then add the views in - starting with the body tempalte [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:02:57] then add navigation [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:03:00] content-main? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:03:08] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:03:20] of course this brings up an interesting licensing dilemma i think [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:03:41] oh dear... lets hear it... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:04:04] if we chop that stylesheet up across the *.ft what's the implication for the license? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:04:43] If David approved the license then it means we can modify it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:05:07] We may need to credit each "chunk" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:05:17] it may be easier to just rewrite it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:05:20] right, i guess my concern was having to put his credit/copyright notice on each *ft [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:05:31] right, that was my concern [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:05:32] Nothing says we can't use it for inspiration [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:05:54] i considered it temporary -- i think everyone did, just to get us going [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:06:15] hiya.... rgardler here you have a full log of todays session.... ( in case you miss something..) http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/forrest.log.06Sep2005 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:06:17] That's cool then, as long as we don;t cut and paste from it we should be OK. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:06:18] just didn't want to use it too far [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:06:32] cool [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:06:40] HI Cheche [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:06:56] thanks for the link - I'm waiting for a clean checkout of Forrest, I'll go read the logs [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:07:38] I am so sorry that I could not help today, but I am busy with lot of stuff..., but It is very nice to see how good this tuesday has been [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:31:21] Hurrah - I got a new copy of Forrest and all my really weird errors have gone [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:31:27] Now to do some work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:31:47] I read the log (thanks cheche) but I'm confused, so I'm just going to get on with it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:32:03] We can edit when it is shown to be rubbish ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [13:58:51] i just responded to your latest commit in email, is that prefered or here? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:00:53] If you mean the removal of the action stuff (I've not read the mail) I realised my mistake. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:00:57] I'm just reverting now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:10:57] Tim - you monitroing still? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:11:26] yep [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:12:15] About this action thing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:12:26] I get No attribute named "src" is associated with the configuration element "act" at null:111:54 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:12:29] whenever I use the locationmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:12:31] any ideas? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:12:46] yeah... you're not gonna like it;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:13:47] OK, if I'm not going to like it can I leave the removal in place in order to proceed with building the processing pipeline - testing can be done in the views plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:18:25] i'll fix it temporairly with a commit in a sec [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:18:41] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:19:25] OK - that's fine, for now I'm proceeding without - will report to list [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:19:41] (my son is in bed being a good boy for a change) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:30:51] i've been thinking lately about using URN's for locationmap resolution to totally separate the physicall locations. I realize you're wanting to get stuff done but maybe just think about it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:31:59] Quit rgardler has left this server. (Remote closed the connection) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:57:37] Join rgardler has joined this channel. (n=rgardler@ip-213-92-134-135.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:58:01] was wondering if you broke it and took the rest of the night of;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:59:26] No, it was the wireless going down again, so I took a wlk to the sea. Bacl for another hour (I only paid for wireless until midnight GMT) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [14:59:46] So, you've been thinking of URN's for locationmap resolving - tell me more [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:00:13] did your latest commit's work on your machine? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:00:26] Yes (I think ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:01:13] for some sources, it's necessary to pass the path as matched in; for others like the ones we'll find ourselves doing more of in the near future will be for named "things" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:01:50] OK [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:01:52] i'm just thinking it' look cleaner if the named things weren't {lm:mystylesheet.xsl} but were a standard scheme of some sort [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:02:03] Sounds good... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:02:12] true urns won't work I think because of the ":" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:03:10] (about the plugin - I have broken the index.xml page because it is not an XHTML2 page, but the sample works) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:03:27] I'm listening regarding the URNs idea... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:03:31] but we could do "." instead (e.g. {lm:graphic.project.logo} or something [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:03:42] okay, i was only trying the index page [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:04:00] i didn't see .xml on the lm matches though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:04:27] e.g. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:04:57] It's there (straight after the comment [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:05:58] I've got: (no .xml) am i missing something? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:06:32] the xml isn't included in {0} [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:06:56] {0} means all of the pattern (i.e. including the .xml) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:09:23] ok i goofed locally [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:10:20] essentially, instead of having a bunch of filenames in {lm:}'s it'd be some named resources. Stylesheets aren't so clean though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:10:25] I just turned the index page into an XHTML page so it works as well now (svn up) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:10:33] So, tell me more about the URN idea [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:10:55] What advantage does it give us over a defined URL space? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:11:26] looks better and not associated with a physical location (ie filename) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:12:20] may be cosmetic i suppose but it makes sense that we're going through the work of separating locations from pipeline processing might as well take it one step further [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:12:31] Ok, I don't see it as a filename, rather a hint [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:12:32] stylesheets don't fit very well obviously [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:12:38] however, I agree it *looks* like a filename [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:12:42] technically it is a hint [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:13:02] but, when a user sees xthml2html.xsl -- they don't think hint [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:13:03] so lets make it *not* look like a filename [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:13:25] that's essentially what i'm saying [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:13:31] :-) Damned IRC - we have the same thoughts but can't communicate them fast enough [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:13:48] So, what would you suggest in place of xhtml2html.xl? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:14:27] not sure, stylesheets present the problem because it's not a simple name, we're conveying a lot of meaning in there [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:15:19] I would be tempted to do something like [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:15:33] transform.xhtml2.html would work if documented that the syntax was resource-type(dot)from-format(dot)to-format [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:15:53] where resource-type could be: transform, style, graphic, etc. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:16:19] Looks good (close to what I was going to suggest)... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:17:00] The problem I see is that it does not indicate what type of transformer it is... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:17:19] i.e. XSLT, chaperon etc... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:17:36] We could add a "tranformation type" in there? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:18:42] yeah, transform.xslt.xhtml.html that's almost long enough to become offensive;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:19:30] Yes, the length is a problem, but it does convey the meaning we need. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:19:32] I say lets do it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:19:38] Others can help trim it down [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:19:45] This needs documenting [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:20:00] Can you add it to a "notes" file in the plugin? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:20:09] I'll change the LM and xmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:20:13] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:24:07] I've committed that if you want to use it as an example in the doc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:25:05] ok thanks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:28:44] For our notes, it just copy the releant part of the IRC log for now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:29:58] ok, [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:30:31] i've got to go get some propane and do some grilling for dinner -- i'll be back in an hour and a half or so [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:30:44] i'll check back periodically [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:31:07] Enjoy your grilling (or bar-b-que as we brits call it) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:31:58] it's a gas grill -- no smoke; so we can't call it true bar-b-que;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:32:58] btw, thinking of the locationmap as sort of a name-resolution module makes the idea of why to go this route more understandable I think [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:33:26] of course i've got handle-server, name-resolution on the brain for other reasons so may it's doesn't have the same impact for others;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:34:33] It makes good sense to me and fits the naming conventions we came up with a long time ago. I agree with you "name-resolution module" concept and we should document it as such. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:35:31] Nick twilliams_ is now known as twilliams_at_din. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:40:01] Nick Gav_Zzzzz is now known as Gav. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:40:45] I think Australia is waking up to another beautiful day :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:45:12] Ive just done up, http://localhost:8888/samples/xhtml2_subset.xml still doesn't look much. What has to happen to get all the new elements working. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:46:23]
etc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:48:25] I can finish adding the rest of the elements to this today [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:48:45] good morning Gav [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:49:03] Morning Ross, has Tim just gone, he's been here forever [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:49:34] Tim is having his dinner (this is weird, I'm having my nightcap, tim is having his dinner and you are waking up) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:49:42] :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:49:56] wheres Tim at [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:50:04] I've not been taking much notice of what is/is not included in the XHTML document... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:50:34] I'm working on the pipelines, it would be good if you keep working on the docs, we won't step on one another [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:50:44] I'm not sure where Tim is, other than it is US [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:51:20] Ok, just wondering what the procedure was now for getting it styled and looking like a prpoerly formatted page, so all the elements actually work. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:52:03] or is that for another day [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:52:03] We are using the stylesheet in the resources/stylesheet directory to do the trnsformation to HTML [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:52:19] this came from some third party web site... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:52:36] see the logs at http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/forrest.log.06Sep2005 to find the URL [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:53:07] I wouldn't worry too much about that though, we need to get the views integration going first... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:53:21] that will add the relevant class and id attributes to enable us to style it propoerly [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:53:38] If you want to help me work out how to get views working, then lets talk... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:54:21] yep, I was around when that was taken, http://etherealwake.com/style/xhtml2html.xslt but was concerned that it was for xhtml1 input and html4.01 output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:54:39] (incidentally, I've only paid for my wireless until midnight GMT + 1, but I am in a sleepy seaside village and suspect that someone is going to manually disconnect me, so I may still be here after that - if I just disappear then they cut me off) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:54:43] I didnt see how new elements were going to be handled [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:55:03] What do you mean "new elements"? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:55:58] the ones introduced into xhtml2 , (used instead of
etc .. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:56:23] I dont think current browsers support them [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:57:01] Although seemed to be working earlier, it is not now in either the .xml or .html page [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:57:42] We have a stylesheet that converts XHTML2 to HTML. Have you done svn up? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:57:49] I can not really do any work right this minute though, sorry Ross, will be getting ready for work very shortly, but I'll log back on at work. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:58:07] OK [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:58:23] Yes about 15 minutes ago I did svn up [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:59:14] where's tim at: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=25 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [15:59:28] back to the grill...;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:01:00] thanks tim [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:02:12] none of the hrefs work either, on the standard only the standard but if the output is being geared to html4.01 then I guess they never will [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:05:33] We need to convert the XHTML to *working* html. I had *assumed* the stylesheet we have worked... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:06:07] As I said I've not been taking any real notice. It is "good enough" to enable us to move forward with the development of the pipeline... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:06:42] However, this highlights why we need a document with a complete set of XHTML elements we wish to use, I think time spent on that is time well spent [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:07:48] no problem, there are a few more elements that need adding. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:08:38] which I can work on at work, but can upload until tonight. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:09:56] That's cool - probably best to send a mail to the list saying you are workng on them, stop others duplicating your work... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:10:10] In the meantime, I'm looking at moving views into the xhtml2 plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:11:48] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:12:53] It is possible that some of the elements wont work until are declared in a .css style sheet but Im not sure. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:18:16] I don't see why that should be the case if (and only if) the XHTML2 to HTML stylesheet works - I think it is more likely that the XSLT is incomplete [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:19:56] well, the xhtml_subset.xml and xhtml_subset.html look the same in the browser, so I guess it works [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:20:39] So your saying the new elements need to be added into the xslt [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:20:50] Join addi has joined this channel. (n=addi@pcp0011048258pcs.elkrdg01.md.comcast.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:24] That is my *guess* yes, I have not actually looked at the code though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:29] and that these new xhtml2 elements should then work on an html4.01 output page [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:35] Good morning addi (is it morning for you, where are you?) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:43] hey all [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:46] hi addi [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:47] Gav: yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:49] actually, no it is evening [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:21:55] good morning all (me backreading and collecting email) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:22:00] 7:20 pm local time [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:22:23] morning Davi [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:22:23] Good evening Addi, Good morning David [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:22:26] d [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:22:50] It's great to see some folk here, I was getting lonely and need to bounce ideas [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:23:23] bounce away [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:23:37] although you may only get an echo from me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:23:44] :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:25:09] First of all, please read the logs from 23:30 regarding using the LM as a name resolver, Tim and I agreed on something but I'd like more eyes on it (logs at http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/forrest.log.06Sep2005) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:33:18] off to work now, catch u all later. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:33:23] how much longer are you here for Ross? I am still reading IRC log, done the mail. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:33:32] see ya Gav thanks for your help [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:33:45] later Gav [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:33:47] Quit Gav has left this server. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:34:27] Not sure, I'm on a roll right now, I have a GnT and the sea is a five minute walk away (I'm in a sleepy little seaside village having a working break) - at least an hour [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:38:07] good, i will try to catch up quick, the second coffee should help [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:38:38] i stayed up too late struggling with that xhtml2html.xsl [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:39:17] hi, I am going to bet right now.... I am happy to see so many talk.... :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:40:17] ok, I cheated and only read the last bit of the log [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:40:31] and it leaves me hanging with "tell me more" about the URN for lm [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:40:58] I have just setup the next day: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:40:59] http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/forrest.log.07Sep2005 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:41:24] good night cheche, sorry i missed you, thanks to Jenny too. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:41:33] excellent, thanks cheche [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:42:00] If you need any help I will be back in 7 hours [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:42:09] it is 1:42 am here in Spain... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:42:51] bye! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:42:58] Quit cheche has left this server. ("Download Gaim: http://gaim.sourceforge.net/") [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:44:05] Cheche - thanks for the logging stuff (couldn't have times the "tell me more" bt better) - sleep well [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:44:50] yup, that was classic cliff hanger writing... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:55:53] Nick twilliams_at_din is now known as twilliams_. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [16:56:48] hey tim, how was the grillin' [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:01:16] hi addi.. pork chops were good... the extra hoppy pale ale is better;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:01:30] you still here Ross, i have skimmed the IRC backreading since i left [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:01:51] hi tim, that makes me want to go to get my breakfast [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:02:07] Stay of the pale ale David... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:02:09] the pale ale or the pork chops? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:02:12] back ASAP ... i have a few little questions [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:02:24] I'll be here, enjou your breakfast [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:02:38] mmm, I'm having an Anchor Liberty Ale as we speak... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:03:05] Stop talking about Ale - all I have is Gin and Tonic and I'm not a fan! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:03:14] ewwww [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:03:26] coffee here, perhaps a morning nip might be nice too - i am working from home [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:05:58] When David gets back I think we should talk about how the pipeline should work... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:06:20] If yo have not done so yet, I recomend you read the TR at http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/forrest/trunk/site-author/content/xdocs/TR/2004/WD-forrest10.html?rev=190420&view=markup [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:06:36] we should add a dev time-zone file on a purely optional basis [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:06:55] Sorry - http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/forrest/trunk/site-author/content/xdocs/TR/2004/WD-forrest10.html?rev=190420 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:06:56] tim i see you are in atlanta. same cost here, farther north [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:07:09] in the DC burbs of Maryland [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:07:34] Better still is to work on the locations plugin and integrate it with Google Maps [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:07:36] my "admin location" is in McLean, Va;) i telecommute from atlanta [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:08:00] bleh, my office has banned telecommuting... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:08:02] lived near Great Falls, Va for quite a few years too [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:08:27] great climbing there! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:09:00] telecommuting's rough, but someone's got to do it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:09:14] *sigh* [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:10:11] rgardler> was that your way of volunteering? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:10:22] i'm interested in seeing that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:12:43] i gather we're now moving views to core now? this being the new core? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:13:30] I'd love to play with Google maps, but I don't have a (paying) use case right now. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:13:41] David has a thing for GIS though... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:13:53] As for current work... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:14:07] Yes, I am just playing with moving views into this plugin... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:14:32] I want feedback on what I'm doing so would like to talk it over when David returns. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:15:14] i asked when I came on early this morning whether the idea was to integrate views in place or *do* the merge now. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:15:37] I'm thinking that we should do them now... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:15:52] we need to rewrite all the contracts to work with XHTML2 anywa... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:16:07] seems daft splitting it into two, WDYT? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:16:13] that's the relization i came to after the stylesheet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:16:18] porridge is cooking on low [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:16:43] OK, so here is what I am thinking... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:16:44] beer is on ice;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:16:55] (stop talking about beer!!!) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:17:03] (it's not fair :-(( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:17:06] okay... okay.... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:17:31] (mind you it's only that rubbish american stuff, so I'll live ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:17:35] i'll slide a cyber beer down the bar at ya [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:17:47] ah no, I dun drink that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:17:52] i have a few questions from the backreading- shall i hold them till you tell us your stuff ross? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:17:58] matter of fact I'm a brewer [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:18:08] Go for it David... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:18:19] and IPAs and bitters are the love of my life [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:18:22] 1) that etherealwake xsl is temporary, but seems to be becoming more [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:18:23] (ADDI next Forrest get together is at your place) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:19:24] more... ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:19:41] (porridge burning?) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:19:42] your 1-- i think everyone gets that it's temporary, no? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:19:56] yah [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:20:02] :-) good one addi, no on low [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:20:23] if it were better quality, it might be tempting but, no, it's temporary [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:20:46] I agree this particular stylesheet is temporary... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:20:48] okay good, that's one dispensed with [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:21:00] s/one/1)/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:21:16] huh? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:21:29] substitute one for 10 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:21:34] errr.. 1) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:21:55] question 1) above is fixed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:23:05] 2) why are we needing "html" output in the internal plugin? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:23:53] there's a fine question... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:23:56] The final goal is to have html serialised to the browser... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:24:15] All we have done is go from step 1) to step 6) in the TR... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:24:27] Now we need to fill in steps 2-5... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:24:47] That's the job of forrest:views (collective term for all steps) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:24:58] ah, so we are getting one one the last bits done first, beauty ... all makes sense now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:25:21] s/one one/ one of/ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:25:56] 3) the naming convention idea - i will need to do more IRC backreading to see why the need [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:25:58] of course the method of 6 will change [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:26:09] to be the aggregation of some of the rest, no? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:26:34] david: OK, get your porridge and we'll discuss when you are ready [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:26:55] sounds like you might need that nip with the porridge [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:27:02] Let me re-read the TR, I'll come back to that question [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:27:25] I started it, my partner is finishing it, no worry team [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:27:41] OK - I see what you mean (reading the headings made sense) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:27:44] me too - going to get TR [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:27:53] i suppose i more going off of what thorsten said this a.m than the TR [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:27:57] Step 1... resolveing - done by lm... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:27:58] got a URL handy? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:28:13] step 2: tranformation - done by input plugins [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:28:33] step 3: Fltering - to be done by views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:28:50] URL for TR? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:28:52] one thing that we missed today is summarising every now and then. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:28:53] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/forrest/trunk/site-author/content/xdocs/TR/2004/WD-forrest10.html?rev=190420 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:28:57] step 4: viewing - to be done by views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:14] step 5: Themeing - to be done by views (CSS) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:31] step 6: serialising - done [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:38] addi yeah, .... svn.apache.org/repos/... thought you might have a browser open [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:42] TR URL - http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/forrest/trunk/site-author/content/xdocs/TR/2004/WD-forrest10.html?rev=190420 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:50] translated to pipelines from this a.m.: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:54] [11:30] index.book.xml ->gives the overall menu which is the context of the request [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:54] [11:30] index.tab.xml -> gives the overall navigation context of the request [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:54] [11:31] index.source.xml -> gives the document in our internal format [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:54] [11:31] this three different request should then be agggreated by the last step of the processing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:54] [11:32] this way we can use dynamic contracts as described in the view termilogy thread to request them in the view [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:55] [11:32] so the request index.xml just aggregates the results of the former [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:29:58] more or less [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:30:22] ta [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:30:48] I read that in the logs, I don't agree with it, I'm glad you brought it up... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:30:58] That is how the *old* skinning system worked... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:31:23] In views all those parts are nuggets and are aggregated in step 3... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:31:42] It is interesting that that discussion came to the conclusion that site.xml is just data, it is... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:31:53] it is just data that feeds into a contract and becomes a nuggest... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:32:12] But since it was Thorsten proposing that I may have missed the point. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:32:54] OH - hang on it wasn't Thorsten, it was you. Have I missed the point? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:33:32] umm... nope it wasn't me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:34:13] i was "quwiltw" back then [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:34:21] asking questions... little more [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:35:08] his point was, as i remember, that we should be able to address any point in the pipeline [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:35:29] i think that those happen to be nuggets that are returning isn't relevant is it? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:36:03] Oh, right sorry (I say your name as you posted it in, got to get the hang of this IRC thing) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:36:36] The fact they are nuggets is relevant because... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:36:39] thorsten was "target-x" btw [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:36:52] perhaps we should ask him about that;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:37:11] it should be possible to make a request for nugetX and get that content. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:37:24] If you want to be able to get *just* the nav then create a view for it.. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:37:35] If you want just the nav + body, create a view for it... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:37:54] That was why I was recently asking about having multiple views for a single page [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:38:03] so are you equating "view" with the "hint" in fname.hint.html? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:38:22] Let me refresh what that is... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:38:23] e.g. index.content.html, index.source.html [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:38:33] Ahhh... thanks. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:38:45] I suppose I am, yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:39:15] (in fact that is exactly the solution Thorsten and I came up with in the lists) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:39:19] that's neat, err... strange... or something... i hadn't thought of views like that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:39:51] right, i think that's why we were "missing" each other.. i was going a cocoon views route with that line of though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:40:09] equating our "views" with parts of the page or stylistic views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:40:15] yum, i will eat and backread ... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:40:32] and equating cocoon views with "renditions" of the source [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:40:40] now it makes more sense [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:41:05] The thread is http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=112548740800003&r=1&w=2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:41:14] btw. Braves are up 2-0 for anyone that cares -- top of 4th [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:41:36] nah, nothing matters til football (american) starts [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:41:59] yeah i picked my argument back up here lately with another committ though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:42:08] Nah - all that matters is England winning the Ashes for the firt time for umpteen years (game starts in 9 hours) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:42:25] doesn't matter... i think i understand better where you're going with it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:42:56] the interesting thing is that Cocoon views is a fork in the pipeline letting you handle it anyway you want. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:43:01] go England! (my welsh friend would frown at that) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:43:17] for example, with our views approach, how would one handle this request? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:43:23] This whole "views" name is a problem - it means too many things [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:43:25] index.rtf [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:43:37] huh? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:43:57] i.e. if it's a different format [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:44:46] with our views we can handle different piece-parts of a page (e.g. nav, tabs, body) but not very well different formats, right? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:46:58] ok, ok,... i'm not afraid of uncomfortable silence;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:47:22] i heard that hit the ground... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:47:32] ... move on... shall we? ;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:47:42] No, I was doing some code... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:47:48] imagine that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:48:01] you are right, views as they stand only do HTML... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:48:13] that is because the other formats are not implemented yet... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:48:58] there is no reason why we can't have contracts that output XSL:FO... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:49:12] and from there PDF, PS, RTF etc. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:50:35] yeah, i'm not pushing for this route or anything but the point was just that cocoon views do those things *and* are orthogonal to pipelines [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:51:12] ie. any step in our pipeline process if desired could be requested as a particular ccocoon view [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:51:40] no matter... i "get" what you're suggesting now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:52:08] what is the use case? (sorry I'm not being obtuse, I just can't see one right now) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:53:37] thanks, your recent discussion has been a good summary [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:53:53] gotta get rid of that name "views" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:54:29] Yeah, I was dismayed to find I'd been away for 10 hours and there was no summary... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:54:37] but then, I've not done one either... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:54:51] As for the name views, Thorsten used structurer in his recent mail... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:54:55] everything we've talked about has been a usecase i though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:54:58] I guess that's a green light... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:55:09] I hope so because I have a structurer.xmap on my hard drive ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:55:46] Tim: Yeah, I meant a use case that is better served by Cocoon views in Forrest.. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:55:55] shucks, i couldn't make it through his email.. but structure sounds narrower than what "views" are right [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:56:06] I think there *is* merit in the idea, I'm just not sure where it will surface [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:56:21] "structurer" was used only for part of it, the name "views" continued to be used for other parts and the whole [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:56:30] i think the usecase might very well be in the implementation [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:56:41] It was David that suggested it and it seems to be sticking [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:56:46] let's see how our own views unfolds [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:57:09] Yes. If you see where it fits, then dive in (I know you will) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:57:42] what made the topic resurface in my own mind was the pluginDocs the other day when i realized that we have to have a regexp matcher to handle these "hints" for *every* matcher [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:58:12] Yes, like I said on the list. they are a special case because they have a fixed URL... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:58:24] there are a couple of others too... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:58:25] whereas with cocoon views we add a "label" signifying a "fork" in the pipeline towards a different serialization [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:58:42] that has to go... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:59:02] The thing about cocoon:views is, as you say, you can fork a pipeline... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:59:07] it'll go into site-author sitemap.xmap soon hopefully [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:59:16] but then you need a pipeline that has a logical place to fork... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:59:25] i see conversations getting mixed here. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [17:59:37] You would do it at source, at step A, at step B, at step C etc... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:00:01] crossley-> no we're on the same page -- he's on the bottom of the page and i'm on the top;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:00:31] in forrest we have source -> internal -> output and that's about it... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:00:35] where would the labels go? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:00:59] My son is crying - backl when I've settled him [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:01:38] funny thing is... i acquiesced long ago;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:02:08] to crying or forrest:views? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:02:48] mine was crying earlier and Ross... bragged was it.... that his was sound asleep;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:03:09] mines asleep now... off to the beer cooler;) be back shortly [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:07:03] Tims right - what goes round comes round - that means I get beer tomorrow :-)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:09:08] >where would the labels go? whereever needed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:09:41] there's a resource (uri) "space"; and orthogonal to that, there are renditions [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:10:09] nice [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:10:27] either way, as i said in the thread the other day, it's a thought... a good one I think... but i'm not hard-pressed on it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:10:50] we can get stuff done if you like rather than bantering on conceptual topics [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:11:14] after all... i've got the "pale ale"-advantage working for me;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:11:26] so i could go on all night [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:11:47] has been necessary discussion to confirm ourselves [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:12:22] Yes, I agree David. Tim, I'm not trying to say cocoon:views are not useful, I'm only saying I don't "get" it yet... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:12:25] if nothing else it has been considerably eductional for me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:12:25] ForrestTuesday finishes in 5 hours time, then we gotta stop [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:12:41] It is normal to have to plug away at something until someone clicks and supports you... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:12:59] You'll soon spot a problem and say "here is where cocoon:views fits" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:13:03] or show it in code sometime soon [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:13:25] Code... ahhh.. code... I have some questions myself... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:13:34] I'm working on integrting views... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:13:49] I've always been concerned about the number of plugins... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:13:59] >or show it in code sometime soon: i think i've got that somewhere but if this conversation isnt' convincing then that code isn't going to be anyway [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:14:35] i think that i am convinced, but lets let ross speak on this other [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:14:38] Tim: if there is a problem we are not solving (or you can solve better) then we will be convinced - code is the best way [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:14:49] i'll save my "plugging away until it clicks" for the "metadata driven forrest" topic [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:14:57] (best way when we don't get it that is) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:14:58] good [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:15:19] i don't think you need to "plug away" at meta data [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:15:20] I like - meta-data is something we a very poor on [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:15:21] ross you were saying? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:15:38] Yes - too many views plugins... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:15:44] yep [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:16:14] We have the ls one, this is OK I think, it converts the contracts to a human readable list (like plugins.xml) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:16:28] the internal one will go into core so that will go [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:16:56] the last is the viewHelper, but I'm looking at that and I see no reason why the matchers are in an output plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:17:12] I guess the original thinking was that the contracts are creating output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:17:16] i was thinking that would also ultimately go into core as well [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:17:31] but now contracts come from anywhere (project, other plugins, core etc.) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:17:37] So, my question is... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:18:00] Can anyone see any reason why the xmap in viewHelper should be in an output plugin? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:18:50] shucks, i suppose i answered prematurely... no i don't see any reason;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:19:33] have you checked in all that you have? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:19:59] No, the views doesn't work yet, I can check it in if you want me to help debug it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:20:33] yeah.. hopefully there's no poor guy out there *using* this plugin... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:21:50] OK, give me a moment to finish the current fix [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:23:23] there are many reasons for "viewHelper", most internal but perhaps some are output helpers that are needed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:25:55] Yeah, I was concerned that would be the case. The truth is that I have not actually *read* the complete xmaps, I was hoping someone might point at one and say - that is output stuff [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:27:13] i hate to always be the "confused guy" but we're talking core sitemap vs. plugin right? as opposed to whether something is output or not [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:27:32] i mean, we have lots of "output" stuff in our core sitemaps [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:29:57] It is my vision that all output (to the client) will be encapsulated in an output plugin... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:30:10] there *should* be no output in the core... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:30:39] core should only provide the standard intermediate format for an output plugin to render and serialize.. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:30:54] meaning forrest will *do* nothing without at least one plugin? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:31:01] At present I see viewHelper as being part of the *internal* stuff [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:31:28] sounds good, keep on [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:31:35] FOrrest will only produce our XHTML2 subset without an output plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:31:48] (which x-smiles can render) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:32:45] So, when I ask "is there anything in the viewHelper plugin" that is truly output... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:33:09] I mean, that a client will see (I think I eventually answered the question, I wonder if you think the same ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:37:01] i'm waiting to see if theres more? i don't know that i agree but waiting for the "floor' to open [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:37:34] floor open... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:39:44] i don't know now... i'm thinking [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:40:35] don't wait on me, not yet up to speed with "views" ... getting closer, but it is moving target. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:41:33] been looking at viewHelping/output.xmap for the last 10 minutes ... T has many notes that certain stuff needs to move out [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:41:59] i guess i'm thinking this is really a bigger picture question than just "views" or whether viewhelper should be in core or a plugin, no? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:42:14] hm, well this is not just about views is it? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:42:45] David: I noticed Thorsten notes, but they are unclear on intent (at least to me) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:42:58] Yes, this is not just about views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:43:11] this is rally looking at forrest outputs xhtml2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:43:45] or um produces xhtml2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:44:07] and then you use output plugins for *everyhting* else [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:44:10] alot of his comments seem "pattern" related [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:44:45] i wasn't/still not smart enough to speak those "patterns" beyond Factory, Facade, Provider, I glaze;( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:45:39] is it not more than that? It's about whether a "web site" is the output, no? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:47:52] Tim: patterns = confusion - I agree, they are a useful concept but assume too much prior knowledge. Difficult to share with the rest of the world (I have a PhD in pattern related stuff and even my academic mind hates them as boundary objects - i.e. things that are supposed to close the gaps in knowledge within a team) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:48:07] this may be a stupid question [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:48:37] but if forrest produces xhtml2 as core and then all is output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:48:50] can views handle all outputs? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:49:09] Addi: not a stupid question at all, a very important one... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:49:17] the answer is, conceptually, yes... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:49:24] but in implementation, no... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:49:31] hopefully the gap is not too large ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:49:50] does me good to hear that. i think there are several that are truly "understood" universally and but once there are hundreds of "patterns" they loose their value [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:50:44] views as other output formats is an important topic [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:50:48] well I know currently views do not handle anything else [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:51:07] maybe output.viewHelper has been a workaround for current processing ... are we looking too close today, do we need to step back [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:51:23] but you propose that core = xhtml2 and views = all output? maybe? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:52:11] kind of... views *handles* or enables all output [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:52:26] one to many vs. = [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:52:27] gotcha, I knew I made that sound a little extreme [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:52:42] David: you may be right, are you OK with that step back being chuck it all into the new plugin and refactor from there? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:55:03] so, again, not to be overtly dense, but what does this say to our current farm of output plugins? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:55:24] How do you mean? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [18:57:50] ross: i don't know enough to say. It sounds like sense to me, then move out bits that don't belong. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:00:46] eh, I've turned meself around in a paper bag - sorry [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:00:52] OK, I don't know enough either, but sine we both think its sense then i'm about to commit (but it doesn't work yet, we can debug together) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:01:03] my brain is really drained [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:01:59] addi: i wonder if we need to forget that we have any plugins at all. Refactor this core stuff, then see what is left for the output plugins to handle [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:02:57] +1 to ignore plugins - they all need to change to handle the new intermediate format anyway (wow this is a big job) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:03:03] addi: me too, fuzzled. Ross commit, we will look. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:03:35] I just committed what I have to SVN. I've basically put all the views matchers into a structurer.xmap file [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:03:40] we need to send a note to the mail list that this is happening! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:03:43] BTW, internal.xhtml broken at moment [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:03:57] we now need to make it work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:04:10] what is internal.xhtml? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:04:23] can't have thorsten and others working on views in the wrong plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:04:34] xthml2? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:05:01] plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:05:30] whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:05:37] Oh yeah :-)) I'm getting tired [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:05:49] http://localhost:8888/index.html [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:05:51] Why is it broken for you, it works for me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:06:08] Do you mean there is no navigation etc.? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:06:10] "The content of elements must consist of well-formed character data or markup." [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:06:18] Cocoon error [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:06:32] no more clues! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:06:43] it works for me, please do SVN up, don't forget to redeploy the plugin and try again [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:07:09] okay will do [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:07:14] i just svn-uped, local-deployed, forrest ran and all is well... minus the no navi part [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:07:54] No navi is expected, we need to enable views to get it. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:08:01] righto [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:08:15] OK. now to debugging, I'm going to go for a walk so I'll fill you in... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:08:25] so does structurer.xmap == o.a.f.i.views/internal.xmap ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:08:51] You need to uncomment the mount of structurer.xmap (yes it does = both of the other plugins)... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:09:11] this will prevent the processing reaching the test match for html and will instead process with views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:09:22] there are missing stylesheets at present... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:09:33] these need to be svn copy into the new plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:09:46] I'll be back in 10 minutes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:09:54] questions before I go? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:11:39] no i'm good.. i'll commit the draft of my notes on the earlier discussion and take a look [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:12:00] g'nite all [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:12:12] i'm frazzled for the night [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:12:14] thanks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:12:25] Thanks addi, see you on the dev lists [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:12:47] actually before you go, [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:13:17] you had a different idea of what the matcher looked like [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:13:42] Quit addi has left this server. ("Leaving") [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:14:16] you wanted each nugget callable, can you just give the pattern you'd expect for that before you go? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:14:58] okay, i am back with a "working" system, sorry for the noise. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:18:34] already left? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:21:15] I had, but I'm back now. I haven't thought through making each nugget callable, I'm not even convinced we want it, but... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:21:38] since every part of the view is identified by a hook or a contract name, whic [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:21:58] which are unique (given the naming convention) then it would be [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:22:11] simple to write a matcher for that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:22:23] I think. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:23:17] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:23:36] we won't worry about that, stick with **.html, huh? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:23:59] monitor your email at the same time as this list.. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:24:19] i'm gonna keep going until someon tells me I"m doing something dumb;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:25:02] this sure would be a lot easier if thorsten were here;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:25:21] True, but we learn more this way [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:25:51] a different error now, unfortunately, it's bigger:( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:27:51] i'm second guessing myself we did just decide to throw it all in one and factor out later, right? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:27:58] that's expected - just doing svp up [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:28:28] throw it in within reason. I copied all sitemap stuff across yes. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:31:23] um.. i wonder if we should drop the views plugins? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:31:30] That error is because the select is not finding anything, i.e. we have no default view. I'll fix that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:31:49] no i already copied that in too [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:32:51] OK, I'll svn up and edit it (we only want content-main to start as that is the only tmplate I've converted) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:33:10] Do you want to make the code that looks for the *.fv work with the LM? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:33:22] nope [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:33:34] i fear we've already bit off enough [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:33:46] let's get something working again first [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:33:50] Rubbish! ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:34:10] there's bears in this here forrest;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:34:27] Making it work with the lm is a simple job that we know works, it's only replacing {project:content.xdocs} with {lm:... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:34:48] line 110 on in structurer.xmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:35:05] whatever... you're staying awake until it displays something useful though;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:35:32] Yeah I am [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:35:41] Did you commit the *.fv I don;t see it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:36:03] nope not yet, i thought you were going to... i'll do it now. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:36:33] heh heh, that's why I want to find two parts we can work on intependantly [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:37:37] that's tough to do when it's all broke! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:37:40] and i will try to follow the two, fix up bits-and-pieces [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:38:27] All broke, isn't that a bit pessimistic? When we started we had nothing, now we have loads of code ;-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:39:01] So, david, did you spot our forresy into GIS earlier? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:39:46] yes and let is pass to the keeper for now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:40:08] than heaven the cricket isn't on we would have lost you [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:40:47] I wouldn't be so sure, I would have been sat in front of the telly all day not off to a client [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:41:15] good point [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:42:32] i can't get it added [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:42:42] What's the problem? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:43:07] my svn client keeps telling me it's already there [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:43:39] i've removed and checked out again [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:43:41] no luck [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:43:55] i could try fresh checkout i suppose [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:44:07] SVN has hicups like that now and again, I do [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:44:11] i've got a fast connection won't take long [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:44:15] mv folder folder.back [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:44:19] svn up [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:44:38] cp folder.bak folder (say no to the duplicates) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:45:02] Of course, if files have changed you should say yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:45:59] Anywa, I just noticed this is nothing to do with *.fv but *.vt.xml and it's a problem in the xmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:46:51] i've removed, renamed, etc. no luck. i'm doing a fresh checkout [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:47:18] either way it seems that for now both the *fv and *ft will need to be available [Tue Sep 6 2005] [19:52:51] sorry, should have just said you do it.. still waiting.. usually takes several minutes to do a fresh checkout [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:03:16] ok i assume we want a copy rather than a "branch' of the views code, is that right [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:03:37] svn's copy is really wanting to do a light copy [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:03:51] everyone still awake? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:04:03] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:05:32] branch if were are going to put it back otherwise copy i suppose [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:06:01] what do you mean "light copy" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:07:06] ln -s [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:07:08] kinda of [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:07:21] until something changes, then it's a copy [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:08:55] I'm doing copies, bt *not* links, we are going to be messing with the internals, don't want to break sites using views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:08:58] is there any way to search these things? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:09:09] NOTE: I'm making progress [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:09:17] What do you mean "search these things?" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:09:18] things being IRC logs [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:09:24] sorry [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:10:20] Yeah, go to http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/forrest.log.07Sep2005 and search [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:10:27] i know i asked the question earlier about whether we should now *disable* views through forrest.properties to be sure we're really testing it out vs. just the plugin, but i can't find the answer [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:10:40] (note the date, you will need to change it to search yesterday) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:10:54] I already disabled views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:11:11] (in the XHTML2 plugin) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:11:49] you did, shucks 19 hours is probably too long [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:11:56] sorry for the noise [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:12:23] :-)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:13:57] I've got it to the point where it is complaining about speciic contracts [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:14:28] that's good news [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:14:37] problem is, I don't undertand why it wants siteinfo-meta.xml - it's not named in the *.fv [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:15:18] mine can't even find default.fv [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:17:37] Quit rgardler has left this server. (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:18:38] Join rgardler has joined this channel. (n=rgardler@ip-213-92-134-135.aramiska-arc.aramiska.net) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:18:56] Sorry, connection dropped [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:19:14] Did anyone make any suggestions as to why it is looking for siteinfo-meta? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:19:35] no i still haven't gotten that far [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:19:55] did you have to do something locally to get past the .fv problem [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:20:05] ? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:20:12] yeah, its all in SVN [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:23:28] OK, it's not using the *.fv file in the resources/views directory - something wrong with the resolver [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:23:48] I've added a index.fv file and that works (new error though) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:24:08] yeah, i've svn uped several times to no avail [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:25:04] it's looking in o.a.f.internal.view/resources for the default.fv instead of xhtml2/resoures [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:25:40] OK, I have no idea how that fallbackresolver is supposed to work, do you? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:26:04] (when you SVN up don't forget to local-deploy the plugin) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:26:04] i've got a decent idea [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:26:14] Do you fancy tackling that then? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:27:00] i intentionally did *not* locally deploy views/viewhelper because it should no longer be necessary [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:27:22] i suppose that's wrong though if you're working and i'm not [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:28:19] it depends on what you mean "working", I'm moving forwards, but it is not working yet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:28:47] that's what i mean [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:28:58] My current error is "ElemTemplateElement error: content-main-body" [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:29:02] what is yours? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:29:03] i'm still stuck on default.fv looking in the view plugin [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:29:26] What is the error? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:29:52] i think my problem is that it's defined in forrest.xconf to look for this stuff in a.o.f.internal.view [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:30:04] mine is same as Ross' [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:30:13] strange [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:30:22] David, do you have the *old* plugins deployed? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:30:40] aha righto ross, not so strange [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:31:04] no [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:31:17] back to strange then :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:31:33] funny how that happens [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:31:40] ls forrest/build/pluginsorg.apache.forrest.plugin.input.projectInfo [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:31:41] org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:31:41] org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.pdf [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:32:05] I'm removing my old plugins to Xcheck [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:32:15] good news is that by changing the location of my views in forrest.xconf, i'm now at the same place that you guys are [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:32:24] so i think my hunch is correct [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:32:35] No, because I haven't rouched forrest.xconf [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:32:39] if you guys build clean, you'd probably end up with me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:32:46] if you build clean you would [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:32:57] you would have to that is [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:34:04] Nope, I did build clean and am still at the same place [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:34:15] Are you sure you have done svn up and ant local-deploy? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:34:41] (svn up on the whole tree that is) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:35:20] yeah, did more than that -- i did a whole fresh checkout [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:35:28] rebuilt forrest [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:35:34] ant local-deployed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:35:34] I am same as Ross' after build clean etc etc [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:36:06] this is very strange (I also did a clean checkout when I started today) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:36:27] we're all pretty much at the same place now though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:36:28] Anyway, it has turned up an important issue. The forrest.xconf settings are getting in the way [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:36:56] We can't change forrest.xconf in a backward incompatible way [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:36:59] they helped my get back in order;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:37:46] where are the "forrest view-internal" and "forrest view-themes" set? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:37:53] i doubt the view-internal and view-themes need to worry about backward compat [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:38:05] sorry, where are they *used* [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:38:06] in forrest.xconf [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:38:14] fallbacks i think [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:38:46] OK, that will explain the problem I was having before putting the index.fv file in place (I'm sure you don't have that file Tim) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:38:52] you guys need contract.xsl and friends copied into your stylesheet directory [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:39:48] I've got contract.property.xsl - others haven't shown up as needed yet [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:41:12] contract.xsl [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:41:19] have you checked error.log? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:41:30] that got me past the error you were seeing [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:41:49] Oh OK, ban it in SVN for us then [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:41:50] now i'm on to a non-descript unhelpful resource not found problem;( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:42:13] ban it? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:42:18] bung it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:42:35] or bang it in [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:43:00] However *do not* commit the forrest.xconf change, it will break peoples work on the old views plugins [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:43:59] commited not xconf stuff [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:46:56] damn! I hate these errors with no meaningful report [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:47:38] http://localhost:8888/prepare.view.index.html shows the problem [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:48:16] No it doesn't ignore that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:48:34] that's another resource not found for me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:48:43] i think the probelm is in structurer.xmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:48:56] ;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:49:26] I was just taking the mickey out of you, I'm glad you put the smiley in I'm too tired to spot sarcasm :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:50:17] ok, i'm laughing out loud now;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:50:53] ln 233 should probably read: " [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:51:14] if everyone agrees with the new and improved error message i'll comitt that;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:51:22] No, it's calling the *.xml matcher [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:51:37] (in internal.xmap) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:54:00] r279231 "contract*.xsl" ... Tim: should use 'svn copy' or we lose history [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:54:22] Although you could be right about the point at which the failure is occuring [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:55:15] i think you think it is calling internal.xmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:55:16] If you make that change you get an interesting error (that I thought I'd fied) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:55:49] i think it's the gray area of the cocoon protocol that's getting us again. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:56:28] Well, we certainly narrowed the problem down to that point the {lm: doesn;t work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:57:20] yeah, the crappy thing is that i've seen this before or somethign very similar in my lm testing but can't think of anything useful [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:57:28] VICTORY!!!!! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:57:38] I'm committing now (there are workarounds) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [20:59:11] committed - go see what teamwork does (it's still only content) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:00:43] nice [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:01:01] sample doesn't work [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:01:36] oh who needs it... index works;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:02:24] OK, I'm doing one more contract then I'm off to bed - the slackers can catch up from the logs, I can't be bothered writing up now (it's 5.00 am here) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:02:43] Anyway - David has been tracking our every move [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:03:01] heck i figured i could do the full 24 hours;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:03:14] but not sure i have bigger picture [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:03:38] I'm not sure I have the smaller picture :-( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:03:40] big pictures are overrated past midnight;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:03:48] yeah tim, if we can hang out till cheche returns, that would be good [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:04:26] um... kidding...joke... little humor for the a.m [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:04:39] when does cheche return? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:05:09] he said 7 hours [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:05:53] how long ago was that? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:06:31] nevermind, i've got the log up in another window [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:06:41] [01:42] If you need any help I will be back in 7 hours [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:06:42] [01:42] it is 1:42 am here in Spain... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:08:06] we'll see how long i last [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:08:26] i'll spend some time understanding what kind of mess we've gotten ourselves into;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:09:21] I added the title contract :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:09:41] OK, there are a few things that need documenting so I'll say them here... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:10:08] You need to edit forrest.xconf as the view plugin names are hard coded in there (shame on you Thorsten) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:10:48] the templates in the xhtml2 plugin are in the wrong place, they should be in resource/templates (in fact all plugin templates should be in this location) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:11:14] we have no support of navigation [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:11:56] the locationmap is not working from the structurer.xmap, nore does cocoon://{1}.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:12:25] Addi is going to brew a special IPA for our next get together at his place [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:12:41] I'm going to bed [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:12:58] Thanks for your invaluable help Tim [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:08] Thanks for your invaluable encouragement and oversight David [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:10] thanks to you Ross ... big one [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:18] bah, nothing much from me [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:25] Thanks to everyone who has checked in through the day [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:32] Thanks to my mum [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:35] Good night all [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:36] enjoy a couple hours sleep [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:13:44] good night john-boy [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:14:08] Quit rgardler has left this server. () [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:17:40] sample works again now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:23:51] Hmm i just did 'svn up' and now getting trouble with org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.view/resources/views/default.fv not found [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:24:46] that's what i had before i changed forrest.xconf [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:26:05] ah, i wondered that from Ross comment above [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:28:00] do you have 'svn diff' to give me a hint [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:07] Index: forrest-core.xconf [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:07] =================================================================== [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:07] --- forrest-core.xconf (revision 279232) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:07] +++ forrest-core.xconf (working copy) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:08] @@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:08] @forrest.home@/whiteboard/plugins [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:10] @forrest.home@/build/plugins [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:12] @context.home@/locationmap.xml [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:14] - @forrest.home@/build/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.view [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:16] - @forrest.home@/build/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.view/resources/views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:19] + @forrest.home@/build/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:21] + @forrest.home@/build/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2/resources/views [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:25] .fv [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:26] default [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:30] [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:32] is that readable? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:36] sorry it didn't come across too well [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:30:40] yes thanks [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:33:12] i'm not sure why he didn't add it to the project component-instance though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:33:38] that way we could just define it on the forrest.properties for the xhtml2 project and wouldn't have to worry about it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:33:39] okay, i am back working 'forrest run' now, thanks. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:34:00] did you see my last? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:35:07] i am at r279241 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:35:24] i meant my last irc message [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:35:55] being not sure why these values aren't added to the project component-instance so that they're overrideable by forrest.properties [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:36:41] yep, that sounds better. It was probably just a quick hack. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:36:47] stiil in there [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:37:45] it seems a fairly easy fix but i'm reluctant to do it since this particular thing has been so flaky [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:38:07] and i've never actually messed with them before [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:39:30] shall i just record a Jira issue and we get on with other things [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:39:33] what happens with the ConfModule if a property doesn't exist in the properties file? I assume it falls back gracefully [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:40:04] shucks, i suppose that's the responsible thing to do [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:40:10] default.forrest.properties perhaps [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:40:30] i'll see if he added his themes in there [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:41:45] nope [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:42:44] i'm pretty sure it's a quick and easy thing but if I'm wrong it might very well be bigger breakage than i'm comfortable with... let's log it and move on [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:43:03] okay i will log it [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:43:39] i'll do a fresh checkout at some point and play around with that. i don't want to try to test a config change like that on an exising checkout [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:43:58] do you have stuff to get on with, just talk if we need to [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:44:14] hey everyone [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:44:17] sleep is all;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:44:18] whats been happening [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:44:19] Join ipv6guru has joined this channel. (n=ipv6guru@203-59-250-35.dyn.iinet.net.au) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:44:29] i'll follow up with the logs later, can someone give me a very quick summary [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:44:33] and where i can help out right now [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:44:47] still here then, the hardened few [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:45:26] there is a good summary in log recently from Ross and Tim [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:45:37] http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forrest/forrest.log.07Sep2005 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:45:42] read back about 30mins or so for key info from Ross [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:46:36] sleep? can't have people doing that :-) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:47:11] almost 20 hours [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:47:20] ain't that enough bossman? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:47:38] sure is mate [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:48:24] 06:09 in the logs is where Ross' comments start [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:48:37] turns out they give some key info but not necessarily a summary [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:49:14] I'm reluctant to do that either as I'm not sure that I fully grasp everything but here goes.... [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:49:17] i have the entire log with me, thats not a problem. anyways, i'll go through them and make a summary to get started [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:49:52] oh, ok even better;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:51:08] Is this going to continue today, or are we wrapping it up sometime? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:51:22] as far as a starting point, i guess i'd say that we've got the xhtml2 displaying sans navigation and theming [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:51:22] Nick ipv6guru is now known as Gav. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:51:35] Diwaker, Gav, if you do 'svn up' and add the forrest-core.xconf patch above, then build clean, cd whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2; local-deploy; forrest run [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:51:43] as much as i like it, i hope it ends today;) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:51:57] i think we have around 70 min before it "officially" ends [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:52:16] Well you've had a long stint Tim so no doubt [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:52:47] crossley : will do, thanks. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:52:49] david is tough on us, huh? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:53:08] david: thanks, i just ran into the site-meta-info problem so was looking through the logs for the patch [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:53:32] yes, if people still here then we can go a bit longer, then we have to close it, because that was our decision [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:54:30] the templates don't seem to be picked up. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:54:55] I was just asking because I have just checked in for a few minutes on my lunch-break, but could have carried on when back home in about 4 hours, so I guess it will be wrapped up by then. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:55:01] right before ross left, he commited a content-title.ft template and based on the comments in the template, it isn't coming through [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:56:01] seems we have the following outstanding: [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:56:10] 1) locationmaps not working in structurer.xmap [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:56:23] 2) templates *.ft not being picked up [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:56:40] 3) theming/navi not being done [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:56:59] diwaker : There are 2 logs, do you have them both? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:57:10] 4) templates in wrong place (ross's comment 6:10 [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:57:16] 2 logs? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:57:33] JennyCurran and David's local log maybe? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:57:52] everything should be on the cheche url though [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:58:04] i have a local client log of the channel since we started [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:58:06] unless I am mistaken, the current log began at 0:00 hours, and judging by the content start it was a few hours in [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:58:21] JennyCurran has today and yesterday - two logs - switch the date [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:58:49] your IRC client might simply not be displaying everything [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:58:50] right switch 7 to 6 Sept on the url [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:01] thats what I thought [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:17] i have local unbroken log from before the start, which i will add to "events" svn later [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:24] Gav: oh ok, i thought you were talking about something else [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:39] david: same here [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:41] just in case [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:48] most people do :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:53] twilliams: was that it for your numbered points [Tue Sep 6 2005] [21:59:54] i guess :) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:00:31] sorry lost focus;( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:01:51] 5) new issue - views should be fully configurable by the project (e.g. view-internal && view-themes) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:02:13] diwaker: don't let tim's quick list stop you doing a summary too [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:02:25] certainly [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:03:20] yeah, sorry i didn't mean to distract from the need for that summary; i think in numbered bullets and concrete tasks, sorry [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:03:44] tim: its a good practice! [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:05:19] 6) cocoon protocol resolution isn't working from structurer.xmap (ross) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:06:10] i don't think i'm going to make it for cheche, i've got to go to work in a few hours [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:07:46] I've enjoyed it... see you next time around... thanks everyone [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:08:26] thanks a million Tim. Yes it has been fun ... and productive [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:09:22] Part twilliams_ has left this channel. ("Leaving") [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:12:33] diwaker, i have been working on the RELAX NG grammars for our internal subset, so will continue that [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:13:00] ok [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:13:23] if you have any questions about other stuff from today, then i can try to help. [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:20:41] * diwaker digging through the log and starting work on the summary [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:21:32] david: did we finally put anything up on any of the wikis? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:21:38] i'd like to include the URL if we did [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:22:57] i didn't notice any of that, i don't think that we did. Tim added some notes to whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.xhtml2/notes.txt about one particular topic [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:23:06] alright [Tue Sep 6 2005] [22:43:27] Quit Gav has left this server. (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:33:32] Join x-targe1 has joined this channel. (n=thorsten@d83-180-133-27.cust.tele2.es) [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:33:42] hi [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:33:46] bummer [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:33:56] what [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:33:58] I did not have any internet connnection [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:34:07] yesterday [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:34:09] :( [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:34:28] that is a bummer, for all of us ... it happens [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:35:13] Ross and Tim put in a big night each [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:36:28] it hppend for you as well? [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:37:00] no, i did stuff too,but hard to keep up with them [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:37:08] jeje [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:37:11] yes [Tue Sep 6 2005] [23:46:56] Part x-targe1 has left this channel. () [Wed Sep 7 2005] [00:05:52] Kick You have been kicked from the channel by crossley. (closing this channel)